Massachusetts School and District Profiles

James L. Mulcahey Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mulcahey Elementary School
Organization Information
District:Taunton (02930000)School type:Elementary School
School:Mulcahey Elementary School (02930015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75, Target = 84.9CPI = 75, Target = 84.9CPI = 75, Target = 84.9 74.1 72.7 75.0 2.3 84.9 87.1 1617050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.3, Target = 82.8CPI = 70.3, Target = 82.8CPI = 70.3, Target = 82.8 70.5 65.9 70.3 4.4 82.8 85.3 2610750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.3, Target = 71.4CPI = 72.3, Target = 71.4 68.8 68.8 72.3 3.5 71.4 84.4 299275On Target
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 51.5, Target = 73.8CPI = 51.5, Target = 73.8CPI = 51.5, Target = 73.8 55.0 43.8 51.5 7.7 73.8 77.5 163350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black  90.0---- 95.0-25--
Hispanic/Latino  83.8---- 91.9-34--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 80.9, Target = 84.9CPI = 80.9, Target = 84.9CPI = 80.9, Target = 84.9 74.1 75.3 80.9 5.6 84.9 87.1 1610150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 71.6, Target = 85.3CPI = 71.6, Target = 85.3CPI = 71.6, Target = 85.3 74.8 70.9 71.6 0.7 85.3 87.4 1017150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 63, Target = 82.6CPI = 63, Target = 82.6CPI = 63, Target = 82.6 70.2 63.1 63.0 -0.1 82.6 85.1 910825No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.7, Target = 68.7CPI = 63.7, Target = 68.7CPI = 63.7, Target = 68.7 65.8 65.8 63.7 -2.1 68.7 82.9 109325No Change
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 41.2, Target = 73.3CPI = 41.2, Target = 73.3CPI = 41.2, Target = 73.3 54.2 43.8 41.2 -2.6 73.3 77.1 5340Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black  86.3---- 93.2-26--
Hispanic/Latino  73.8---- 86.9-34--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 79, Target = 85.5CPI = 79, Target = 85.5CPI = 79, Target = 85.5 75.2 73.7 79.0 5.3 85.5 87.6 1210150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.3 2.91700 13.1 9.417025
High needs 1.1 1.910725 19.3 12.110725
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.4 2.29225 16.4 9.89225
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0330 37.5 30.33325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--25---25-
Hispanic/Latino--34---34-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 4.0 3.01010 12.1 4.010125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.7 17.517125 18.3 21.11710
High needs 10.2 13.010825 27.3 29.61080
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.2 14.09325 24.7 29.0930
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 2.9340 43.8 55.9340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--26---26-
Hispanic/Latino--34---34-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 17.2 23.810125 17.2 14.910125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 17.0 35.0 18.0 51.0No73100Above Target
High needsSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 17.0 30.0 13.0 51.0No3975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 13.0 39.0 26.0 51.0No31100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 18.5 32.0 13.5 51.0No4475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 16.0 39.0 23.0 51.0Yes73100Above Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 12.5 35.0 22.5 51.0No39100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 12.0 35.0 23.0 51.0No31100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 17.0 39.0 22.0 51.0Yes44100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 76.5 60.02825
High needs 76.5 60.02825
EL and Former EL- 60.028-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19118999Yes19119099Yes----
High needs12612498Yes12612599Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged11110998Yes11111099Yes----
EL and Former EL20---20-------
Students w/ disabilities393897Yes3939100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black343397Yes3434100Yes----
Hispanic/Latino3535100Yes3535100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White10810799Yes10810799Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles