Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph Case Jr High
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph Case Jr High
Organization Information
District:Swansea (02920000)School type:Middle School
School:Joseph Case Jr High (02920305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 94.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher All Students 91.1 89.3 91.0 1.7 94.8 95.6 5449150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 84.7, Target = 89.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 84.7, Target = 89.6 75 or Higher High needs 82.1 80.5 84.7 4.2 89.6 91.1 7514550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.5, Target = 87.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 88.5, Target = 87.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 86.6 86.6 88.5 1.9 87.7 93.3 7710075On Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.8, Target = 82.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 75.8, Target = 82.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 69.8 66.1 75.8 9.7 82.4 84.9 706350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.7, Target = 95 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.7, Target = 95 75 or Higher White 91.4 90.2 91.7 1.5 95.0 95.7 4646650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.8, Target = 86.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 78.8, Target = 86.5 75 or Higher All Students 76.9 74.1 78.8 4.7 86.5 88.5 4949050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 64.6, Target = 78.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 64.6, Target = 78.9 75 or Higher High needs 63.8 64.2 64.6 0.4 78.9 81.9 5814450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.7, Target = 73.4 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 68.7, Target = 73.4 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 71.0 71.0 68.7 -2.3 73.4 85.5 529925No Change
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 52, Target = 70.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 52, Target = 70.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 49.6 46.6 52.0 5.4 70.6 74.8 556350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79.5, Target = 86.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 79.5, Target = 86.8 75 or Higher White 77.3 75.1 79.5 4.4 86.8 88.7 4146550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.6, Target = 89.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 79.6, Target = 89.2 75 or Higher All Students 81.5 78.8 79.6 0.8 89.2 90.8 6916750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.6, Target = 82.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 71.6, Target = 82.5 75 or Higher High needs 70.0 67.8 71.6 3.8 82.5 85.0 915175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.8, Target = 76.4 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 78.8, Target = 76.4CPI = 78.8, Target = 76.475 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 74.3 74.3 78.8 4.5 76.4 87.2 9733100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  57.5---- 78.8-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.1, Target = 89.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 80.1, Target = 89.3 75 or Higher White 81.6 79.1 80.1 1.0 89.3 90.8 6215750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.9 13.84910 4.0 3.349125
High needs 11.6 9.71450 9.0 6.914525
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.2 12.01000 4.5 3.010025
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 1.7 3.26325 18.6 14.36325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.9 14.44660 3.2 2.846625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.1 22.04900 17.7 15.549025
High needs 10.3 16.014425 32.3 34.71440
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.4 17.29925 21.4 29.3990
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 9.56325 59.3 52.46325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.3 22.64650 16.2 14.64650
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.3 2.41670 7.7 6.016725
High needs 0.0 5.95125 13.3 15.7510
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 3.03325 5.9 3.03325
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.7 1.91570 7.0 5.715725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 43.0 40.5 -2.5 51.0Yes47875On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 44.0 49.0 5.0 51.0Yes13575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45.5, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 45.0 45.5 0.5 51.0Yes9475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 42.0 41.0 -1.0 51.0Yes5575On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 43.0 40.0 -3.0 51.0No45325Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 38.0 48.0 10.0 51.0Yes47875On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 36.0 46.0 10.0 51.0No13575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 38.5 43.0 4.5 51.0No9450Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 46, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 28.5 46.0 17.5 51.0No55100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 38.0 48.0 10.0 51.0Yes45375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03.00-
High needs- 60.03.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.03.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students51050298Yes51050198Yes17217099Yes
High needs15515097Yes15514996Yes545398Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged10710497Yes10710396Yes3434100Yes
EL and Former EL6---6---2---
Students w/ disabilities666497Yes666497Yes232296Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White48147599Yes48147499Yes16115999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles