Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Van Sickle Prep

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Van Sickle Academy

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Van Sickle Academy (02810480)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 4

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.6	73.6	64.4	-9.2	85.8	87.8	3	289	0	Declined
High needs		73.9	71.1	62.6	-8.5	84.8	87.0	5	241	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.8	72.8	63.7	-9.1	75.1	86.4	4	222	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		57.3	61.7	51.2	-10.5	75.1	78.7	4	61	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		58.5	55.9	55.5	-0.4	75.8	79.3	16	59	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		74.4	79.2	62.0	-17.2	85.1	87.2	4	52	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		73.9	72.6	66.7	-5.9	84.8	87.0	10	198	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		84.1	76.0	61.7	-14.3	90.7	92.1	1	32	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.2	52.0	39.9	-12.1	70.4	74.6	2	280	0	Declined
High needs		47.9	50.2	37.6	-12.6	69.6	74.0	2	234	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.8	50.8	38.3	-12.5	54.9	75.4	2	215	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		39.7	46.1	33.1	-13.0	64.8	69.9	3	62	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		41.0	38.5	29.2	-9.3	65.6	70.5	4	60	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		48.4	50.3	37.0	-13.3	69.9	74.2	1	52	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		47.4	51.7	42.8	-8.9	69.3	73.7	3	190	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		57.2	54.1	33.1	-21.0	75.0	78.6	1	31	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	41.6	31.5	-10.1	69.1	73.5	2	115	0	Declined
High needs		45.7	40.3	30.8	-9.5	68.3	72.9	2	95	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		40.8	40.8	32.0	-8.8	45.7	70.4	2	86	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		38.1	27.1	22.2	-4.9	63.9	69.1	3	27	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		48.2	35.1	29.2	-5.9	69.8	74.1	6	24	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		43.7	40.4	34.0	-6.4	67.2	71.9	5	78	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.3	1.7	289	0	15.4	26.6	289	0
High needs	2.7	2.1	241	0	17.8	29.5	241	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.9	2.3	222	0	16.3	27.9	222	0
EL and Former EL	2.4	0.0	61	0	27.1	42.6	61	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.5	1.7	59	25	37.4	39.0	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	1.3	0.0	52	0	9.1	30.8	52	0
Hispanic/Latino	2.7	2.0	198	0	16.5	23.7	198	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.1	3.1	32	0	11.1	28.1	32	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.4	1.4	280	0	45.5	60.0	280	0
High needs	4.3	1.3	234	0	47.8	64.5	234	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.6	1.4	215	0	46.8	63.7	215	0
EL and Former EL	4.2	0.0	62	0	53.9	71.0	62	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	60	0	68.0	75.0	60	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	6.4	0.0	52	0	48.7	65.4	52	0
Hispanic/Latino	4.2	2.1	190	0	46.4	56.3	190	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.2	0.0	31	0	40.8	67.7	31	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.0	0.0	115	0	57.2	68.7	115	0
High needs	1.2	0.0	95	0	59.6	70.5	95	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.3	0.0	86	0	57.8	68.6	86	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	27	0	84.7	85.2	27	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	24	0	70.3	66.7	24	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.9	0.0	78	0	60.1	64.1	78	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.0	24.0	-17.0	51.0	No	253	0	Below Target
High needs		42.0	26.0	-16.0	51.0	No	208	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	26.0	-17.0	51.0	No	196	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		47.0	33.5	-13.5	51.0	No	48	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		41.0	40.0	-1.0	51.0	No	53	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		44.0	17.5	-26.5	51.0	No	48	0	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		41.0	26.0	-15.0	51.0	No	177	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		38.0	25.5	-12.5	51.0	No	24	0	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		39.0	13.0	-26.0	51.0	No	246	0	Below Target
High needs		39.0	13.0	-26.0	51.0	No	203	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	13.0	-25.0	51.0	No	190	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		46.5	18.0	-28.5	51.0	No	46	0	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		39.5	22.0	-17.5	51.0	No	54	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		36.0	14.0	-22.0	51.0	No	49	0	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		39.0	13.0	-26.0	51.0	No	169	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		39.0	18.5	-20.5	51.0	No	24	0	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	35.5	60.0	46.00	0
High needs	35.5	60.0	46.00	0
EL and Former EL	35.5	60.0	46.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	385	350	94	No	384	335	93	No	150	133	94	No
High needs	328	297	95	Yes	327	284	93	No	126	112	94	No
Econ. Disadvantaged	292	263	95	Yes	291	251	93	No	109	98	95	Yes
EL and Former EL	93	86	95	Yes	93	87	95	Yes	38	35	96	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	89	76	92	No	89	74	91	No	36	29	91	No
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	66	62	96	Yes	64	59	95	Yes	24	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	266	243	95	Yes	267	232	93	No	101	90	95	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	42	35	92	No	42	34	91	No	20	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.