Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Chestnut Accelerated Middle School (Talented and Gifted)

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Chestnut Accelerated Middle School (Talented and Gifted)

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Chestnut Accelerated Middle School (Talented and Gifted) (02810367)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 4

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.8	87.3	87.8	0.5	80.1	82.9	38	227	100	Above Target
High needs		63.9	84.6	85.6	1.0	78.9	82.0	79	187	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.1	86.1	86.0	-0.1	87.3	93.1	63	170	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		45.0	76.4	84.2	7.8	67.9	72.5	80	38	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		45.2	66.7	67.2	0.5	68.0	72.6	44	58	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		80.4	-	93.9	19.2	88.6	90.2	95	37	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		61.0	86.0	84.0	-2.0	77.3	80.5	60	147	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		77.7	91.7	94.4	2.7	87.0	88.9	67	31	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.1	76.9	81.4	4.5	69.1	73.6	58	228	100	Above Target
High needs		44.9	74.7	79.3	4.6	67.9	72.5	95	188	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		76.1	76.1	79.8	3.7	78.1	88.1	92	171	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		30.4	73.6	75.7	2.1	59.4	65.2	80	38	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		33.0	58.8	62.3	3.5	60.9	66.5	84	59	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		62.9	-	89.2	37.4	78.4	81.5	99	37	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		40.7	76.5	76.9	0.4	65.4	70.4	83	147	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		66.1	79.6	89.1	9.5	80.2	83.1	80	32	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.8	73.8	69.0	-4.8	66.1	70.9	31	50	100	Above Target
High needs		39.4	69.9	68.6	-1.3	64.7	69.7	82	43	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.8	72.8	67.3	-5.5	75.1	86.4	69	39	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		38.1	73.1	65.7	-7.4	63.9	69.1	84	35	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.0	9.3	227	0	8.6	6.2	227	25
High needs	8.8	9.1	187	0	10.5	7.5	187	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.4	9.4	170	25	9.7	7.6	170	25
EL and Former EL	8.3	10.5	38	25	16.7	13.2	38	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	3.4	58	25	31.5	22.4	58	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2.1	8.1	37	25	14.6	2.7	37	25
Hispanic/Latino	10.1	8.2	147	0	9.5	8.8	147	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.1	16.1	31	25	3.7	0.0	31	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.5	16.7	228	0	15.2	10.5	228	25
High needs	15.7	12.8	188	0	16.9	12.8	188	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.4	13.5	171	0	14.1	12.9	171	0
EL and Former EL	16.7	13.2	38	0	13.9	15.8	38	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.7	59	25	42.6	33.9	59	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4.2	18.9	37	25	51.0	5.4	37	25
Hispanic/Latino	17.2	12.9	147	0	16.0	12.9	147	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	22.2	31.3	32	25	11.1	6.3	32	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.5	0.0	50	0	12.8	14.0	50	0
High needs	1.6	0.0	43	0	17.2	11.6	43	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.7	0.0	39	0	13.8	12.8	39	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.0	0.0	35	0	13.6	17.1	35	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.5	40.0	6.5	51.0	No	183	50	Below Target
High needs		33.0	39.0	6.0	51.0	No	143	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		33.0	39.0	6.0	51.0	No	133	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		27.5	46.5	19.0	51.0	Yes	30	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		37.5	42.0	4.5	51.0	Yes	34	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		33.0	37.0	4.0	51.0	No	111	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.0	51.5	9.5	51.0	Yes	28	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		30.5	31.0	0.5	51.0	Yes	182	75	On Target
High needs		30.0	30.5	0.5	51.0	Yes	142	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		28.0	30.5	2.5	51.0	Yes	132	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		21.5	26.0	4.5	51.0	Yes	30	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		33.0	25.0	-8.0	51.0	Yes	33	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		31.0	28.0	-3.0	51.0	No	110	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		39.0	46.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	29	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	8.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	8.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	8.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	236	233	99	Yes	235	233	99	Yes	53	51	96	Yes
High needs	196	193	98	Yes	195	193	99	Yes	46	44	96	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	179	176	98	Yes	178	176	99	Yes	42	40	95	Yes
EL and Former EL	41	41	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes	6	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	66	63	95	Yes	65	63	97	Yes	13	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	39	39	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	153	151	99	Yes	153	151	99	Yes	37	36	97	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	32	31	97	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	6	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.