Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Springfield Public Day Middle School

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Springfield Public Day Middle School

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 39.9, Target = 60.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 39.9, Target = 60.9 75 or Higher All Students 41.3 31.8 39.9 8.1 60.9 70.7 14250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 39.9, Target = 60.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 39.9, Target = 60.9 75 or Higher High needs 41.3 31.8 39.9 8.1 60.9 70.7 14250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 38.9, Target = 33.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 38.9, Target = 33.7CPI = 38.9, Target = 33.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 27.7 27.7 38.9 11.2 33.7 63.9 136100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 39.9, Target = 60.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 39.9, Target = 60.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 41.3 31.8 39.9 8.1 60.9 70.7 24250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------7--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 26.9, Target = 55.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 26.9, Target = 55.2 75 or Higher All Students 32.8 16.2 26.9 10.7 55.2 66.4 13950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 26.9, Target = 55.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 26.9, Target = 55.2 75 or Higher High needs 32.8 16.2 26.9 10.7 55.2 66.4 13950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 24.3, Target = 20.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 24.3, Target = 20.7CPI = 24.3, Target = 20.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 13.5 13.5 24.3 10.8 20.7 56.8 134100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 26.9, Target = 55.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 26.9, Target = 55.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 32.8 16.2 26.9 10.7 55.2 66.4 23950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------6--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students -------14--
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------2--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0420 73.0 59.54225
High needs 0.0 0.0420 73.0 59.54225
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0360 82.1 61.13625
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0420 73.0 59.54225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--25---25-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--7---7-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0390 91.2 82.13925
High needs 0.0 0.0390 91.2 82.13925
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0340 96.2 88.2340
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0390 91.2 82.13925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--6---6-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students--14---14-
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--2---2-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 35, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 35, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 20.5 35.0 14.5 51.0No39100Above Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 35, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 20.5 35.0 14.5 51.0No39100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-34--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 35, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 35, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 20.5 35.0 14.5 51.0No39100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-6--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 17.0 53.0 36.0 51.0No33100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 17.0 53.0 36.0 51.0No33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 17.0 53.0 36.0 51.0No33100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-3--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04.00-
High needs- 60.04.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.04.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students565496Yes565191No19---
High needs565496Yes565191No19---
Econ. Disadvantaged474698Yes474494No15---
EL and Former EL10---10---2---
Students w/ disabilities565496Yes565191No19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---4---
Hispanic/Latino363597Yes36---12---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White9---9---2---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles