Massachusetts School and District Profiles

White Street

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - White Street

Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:White Street (02810190)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.6, Target = 76.5CPI = 81.6, Target = 76.5CPI = 81.6, Target = 76.5 59.7 81.0 81.6 0.6 76.5 79.9 32145100Above Target
High needsCPI = 80.3, Target = 76.1CPI = 80.3, Target = 76.1CPI = 80.3, Target = 76.1 59.1 79.4 80.3 0.9 76.1 79.6 71131100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.2, Target = 80.7CPI = 80.2, Target = 80.7 78.9 78.9 80.2 1.3 80.7 89.5 6812175On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 85.4, Target = 65.8CPI = 85.4, Target = 65.8CPI = 85.4, Target = 65.8 41.4 77.2 85.4 8.2 65.8 70.7 9048100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 80.1, Target = 75.8CPI = 80.1, Target = 75.8CPI = 80.1, Target = 75.8 58.5 80.3 80.1 -0.2 75.8 79.3 80103100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------10--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.8, Target = 78.1CPI = 89.8, Target = 78.1CPI = 89.8, Target = 78.1 62.5 88.7 89.8 1.1 78.1 81.3 69145100Above Target
High needsCPI = 89.1, Target = 77.9CPI = 89.1, Target = 77.9CPI = 89.1, Target = 77.9 62.1 87.6 89.1 1.5 77.9 81.1 95131100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.5, Target = 88.9CPI = 89.5, Target = 88.9 87.9 87.9 89.5 1.6 88.9 94.0 9512175On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 90.6, Target = 69.9CPI = 90.6, Target = 69.9CPI = 90.6, Target = 69.9 48.4 85.5 90.6 5.1 69.9 74.2 9148100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 88.8, Target = 73.8CPI = 88.8, Target = 73.8CPI = 88.8, Target = 73.8 55.0 86.1 88.8 2.7 73.8 77.5 94103100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------10--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 70.7, Target = 72.3CPI = 70.7, Target = 72.3CPI = 70.7, Target = 72.3 52.5 75.6 70.7 -4.9 72.3 76.3 25410Declined
High needsCPI = 69.2, Target = 72.4CPI = 69.2, Target = 72.4CPI = 69.2, Target = 72.4 52.6 75.0 69.2 -5.8 72.4 76.3 55390Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.4, Target = 76.4CPI = 69.4, Target = 76.4CPI = 69.4, Target = 76.4 74.3 74.3 69.4 -4.9 76.4 87.2 59360Declined
EL and Former EL -------19--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 64.7, Target = 68.9CPI = 64.7, Target = 68.9CPI = 64.7, Target = 68.9 46.6 76.7 64.7 -12.0 68.9 73.3 61290Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------2--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.5 6.21450 7.3 6.91450
High needs 10.1 6.91310 8.3 7.61310
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.3 6.61210 8.2 7.41210
EL and Former EL 6.7 8.34825 11.1 6.34825
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino 8.2 4.91030 5.9 5.81030
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--10---10-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 41.0 31.71450 6.6 4.114525
High needs 37.4 31.31310 7.5 4.613125
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.8 33.11210 7.4 4.112125
EL and Former EL 34.9 45.84825 4.7 6.3480
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino 33.7 27.21030 8.4 4.910325
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--10---10-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 12.5 4.9410 12.5 12.2410
High needs 14.3 5.1390 14.3 12.83925
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.8 2.8360 14.7 11.13625
EL and Former EL--19---19-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino 6.7 3.4290 10.0 13.8290
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--2---2-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 74.0 70.0 -4.0 51.0No84100Above Target
High needsSGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51 73.0 69.5 -3.5 51.0No74100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 75.0 69.0 -6.0 51.0No66100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-26--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-11--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 70.0 69.0 -1.0 51.0No57100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-5--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 68.0 39.5 -28.5 51.0No8625Below Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 67.5 48.0 -19.5 51.0Yes7675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 67.5 54.5 -13.0 51.0Yes6875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-28--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-11--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 66.0 57.0 -9.0 51.0Yes5975On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-5--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 73.0 60.06025
High needs 73.0 60.06025
EL and Former EL 73.0 60.06025
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18017999Yes18017999Yes5656100Yes
High needs16416399Yes16416399Yes5353100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged15415399Yes15415399Yes5050100Yes
EL and Former EL646398Yes646398Yes25---
Students w/ disabilities25---25---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian16---16---5---
Afr. Amer./Black19---19---6---
Hispanic/Latino13213199Yes13213199Yes4141100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White11---11---3---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles