Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Washington

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Washington

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Washington (02810185)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.8	71.9	74.8	2.9	83.0	85.4	15	203	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		70.0	68.1	73.7	5.6	82.5	85.0	39	179	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.2	68.2	73.4	5.2	70.9	84.1	33	167	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		61.1	59.5	68.8	9.3	77.3	80.6	42	52	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		52.6	48.4	64.3	15.9	72.4	76.3	48	35	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		77.1	74.6	81.3	6.7	86.6	88.6	81	48	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		66.8	69.5	70.7	1.2	80.6	83.4	42	117	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.8	75.2	76.1	0.9	84.1	86.4	18	203	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		72.7	72.2	74.3	2.1	84.1	86.4	44	179	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.5	72.5	74.6	2.1	74.8	86.3	42	167	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		69.4	71.0	71.6	0.6	82.2	84.7	43	52	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		63.5	44.5	60.0	15.5	78.7	81.8	36	35	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		78.6	76.3	74.0	-2.3	87.5	89.3	60	48	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		69.6	70.2	73.5	3.3	82.3	84.8	48	117	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.6	69.8	70.0	0.2	81.1	83.8	23	50	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		67.6	67.6	67.8	0.2	81.1	83.8	49	45	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.0	67.0	68.9	1.9	69.8	83.5	57	41	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		63.1	69.3	61.0	-8.3	78.5	81.6	54	25	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.3	4.9	203	0	13.4	9.9	203	25
High needs	3.5	3.9	179	25	16.5	10.1	179	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.8	3.0	167	0	17.1	10.2	167	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	3.8	52	25	26.0	13.5	52	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.9	35	25	37.5	20.0	35	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10.7	6.3	48	0	12.5	6.3	48	25
Hispanic/Latino	2.6	1.7	117	0	14.0	12.8	117	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.5	16.7	203	25	16.3	14.8	203	0
High needs	12.4	16.2	179	25	18.8	16.2	179	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.7	14.4	167	25	19.0	15.6	167	25
EL and Former EL	10.0	19.2	52	25	16.0	13.5	52	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	11.4	35	25	56.3	34.3	35	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8.9	14.6	48	25	14.3	16.7	48	0
Hispanic/Latino	7.0	9.4	117	25	21.9	16.2	117	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.9	10.0	50	0	17.7	14.0	50	25
High needs	10.6	8.9	45	0	21.3	15.6	45	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.1	7.3	41	0	20.5	14.6	41	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.7	4.0	25	0	20.0	24.0	25	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.5	51.5	13.0	51.0	No	130	75	On Target
High needs		37.0	50.5	13.5	51.0	Yes	114	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		33.0	50.5	17.5	51.0	Yes	106	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	38	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		47.0	56.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	39	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		34.5	46.0	11.5	51.0	No	69	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	46.0	-2.0	51.0	No	131	50	Below Target
High needs		47.5	44.0	-3.5	51.0	No	115	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	44.0	-3.0	51.0	No	107	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	39	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		45.5	47.0	1.5	51.0	No	40	50	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		40.0	41.0	1.0	51.0	No	69	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	74.5	60.0	62.00	25
High needs	74.5	60.0	62.00	25
EL and Former EL	74.5	60.0	62.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	222	222	100	Yes	222	222	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes
High needs	196	196	100	Yes	196	196	100	Yes	50	50	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	183	183	100	Yes	183	183	100	Yes	46	46	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	58	58	100	Yes	58	58	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	37	37	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	51	51	100	Yes	51	51	100	Yes	19	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	131	131	100	Yes	131	131	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	2	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.