Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sumner Avenue

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Sumner Avenue

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Sumner Avenue (02810160)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.7	70.4	79.5	9.1	80.0	82.9	26	198	75	On Target
High needs		64.5	67.9	76.9	9.0	79.3	82.3	55	170	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.9	69.9	76.8	6.9	72.4	85.0	50	155	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		57.6	64.8	69.6	4.8	75.3	78.8	46	51	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		49.5	55.4	66.3	10.9	70.5	74.8	55	52	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		72.4	71.3	86.0	14.7	83.9	86.2	88	25	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		62.3	66.3	76.6	10.3	78.0	81.2	67	128	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.2	75.7	82.4	6.7	80.3	83.1	36	198	100	Above Target
High needs		65.5	73.2	80.3	7.1	79.9	82.8	69	170	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.4	75.4	80.2	4.8	77.5	87.7	67	155	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		61.9	72.3	80.4	8.1	77.8	81.0	69	51	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		51.5	61.9	66.8	4.9	71.7	75.8	56	52	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		69.1	75.0	82.0	7.0	82.0	84.6	84	25	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		64.7	72.7	80.9	8.2	79.4	82.4	77	128	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		62.2	72.7	73.4	0.7	78.0	81.1	30	64	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		59.6	70.3	71.8	1.5	76.4	79.8	65	54	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.4	72.4	74.0	1.6	74.7	86.2	74	48	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		58.3	66.3	72.1	5.8	75.7	79.2	76	43	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.8	4.5	198	25	19.4	8.1	198	25
High needs	1.6	3.5	170	25	20.3	9.4	170	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.8	3.9	155	25	17.5	9.0	155	25
EL and Former EL	2.3	2.0	51	0	20.5	15.7	51	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	52	0	43.3	17.3	52	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2.9	4.0	25	25	23.5	0.0	25	25
Hispanic/Latino	1.4	4.7	128	25	22.4	10.9	128	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	21.2	22.7	198	0	17.5	6.1	198	25
High needs	19.2	20.6	170	0	20.3	7.1	170	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	20.1	20.6	155	0	17.8	7.1	155	25
EL and Former EL	17.0	29.4	51	25	21.3	3.9	51	25
Students w/ disabilities	6.6	7.7	52	25	34.4	13.5	52	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	21.2	16.0	25	0	15.2	8.0	25	25
Hispanic/Latino	15.3	19.5	128	25	20.1	5.5	128	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.3	6.3	64	0	14.1	9.4	64	25
High needs	17.0	5.6	54	0	17.0	11.1	54	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	18.8	6.3	48	0	14.6	8.3	48	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	20.0	7.0	43	0	20.0	9.3	43	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		32.5	64.0	31.5	51.0	Yes	118	100	Above Target
High needs		30.0	63.0	33.0	51.0	Yes	99	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		30.0	62.5	32.5	51.0	No	94	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		33.5	72.0	38.5	51.0	No	23	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		23.5	54.0	30.5	51.0	No	20	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		31.0	63.0	32.0	51.0	Yes	79	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.5	63.0	3.5	51.0	Yes	121	100	Above Target
High needs		59.0	64.0	5.0	51.0	No	102	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.0	63.0	5.0	51.0	No	95	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		66.0	74.5	8.5	51.0	Yes	26	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		46.0	58.0	12.0	51.0	No	21	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		57.5	62.0	4.5	51.0	Yes	81	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	84.0	60.0	59.00	25
High needs	84.0	60.0	59.00	25
EL and Former EL	84.0	60.0	59.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	245	243	99	Yes	245	243	99	Yes	77	77	100	Yes
High needs	212	211	100	Yes	212	211	100	Yes	65	65	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	192	191	99	Yes	192	191	99	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	66	65	98	Yes	66	65	98	Yes	23	23	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	59	59	100	Yes	59	59	100	Yes	21	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	12	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	38	38	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	155	155	100	Yes	155	155	100	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24	-	-	-	24	-	-	-	5	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.