Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary O Pottenger

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Mary O Pottenger

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Mary O Pottenger (02810145)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.7	66.5	70.4	3.9	87.6	89.4	9	190	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		77.5	64.3	67.3	3.0	86.9	88.8	16	143	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.9	64.9	68.9	4.0	67.8	82.5	20	131	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		61.4	64.1	60.0	-4.1	77.5	80.7	18	25	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		47.4	38.7	44.1	5.4	69.3	73.7	6	34	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		76.9	65.2	69.7	4.5	86.5	88.5	36	132	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.1	71.1	74.3	3.2	89.6	91.1	5	35	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.2	68.8	68.8	0.0	83.2	85.6	8	188	25	No Change
High needs		70.2	66.7	64.4	-2.3	82.6	85.1	12	141	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.9	67.9	66.5	-1.4	70.6	84.0	14	129	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		56.8	67.2	69.0	1.8	74.8	78.4	35	25	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	41.9	41.7	-0.2	67.3	72.0	6	33	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		69.7	65.3	67.9	2.6	82.3	84.9	31	130	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		73.0	80.5	77.1	-3.4	84.3	86.5	10	35	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.3	66.7	63.9	-2.8	79.8	82.7	16	63	0	Declined
High needs		64.4	64.8	61.5	-3.3	79.2	82.2	31	52	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.1	69.1	62.0	-7.1	71.7	84.6	40	48	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.8	67.7	60.3	-7.4	76.6	79.9	52	39	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.6	2.1	190	0	22.1	19.5	190	25
High needs	3.8	2.1	143	0	23.9	22.4	143	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.2	2.3	131	0	22.9	20.6	131	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	25	0	18.8	28.0	25	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	34	0	58.1	50.0	34	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.4	1.5	132	0	23.4	19.7	132	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.3	2.9	35	0	21.9	20.0	35	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.3	14.9	188	25	19.5	21.3	188	0
High needs	9.4	12.1	141	25	20.8	23.4	141	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.0	12.4	129	25	19.4	21.7	129	0
EL and Former EL	9.4	12.0	25	25	25.0	16.0	25	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.2	0.0	33	0	48.4	48.5	33	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Hispanic/Latino	9.0	13.1	130	25	24.8	21.5	130	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	28.1	20.0	35	0	6.3	11.4	35	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.2	6.3	63	0	24.6	22.2	63	0
High needs	5.6	7.7	52	25	27.8	25.0	52	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.4	8.3	48	25	19.1	25.0	48	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	7.3	5.1	39	0	23.6	25.6	39	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.0	42.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	130	75	On Target
High needs		33.0	43.0	10.0	51.0	No	103	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.5	37.5	5.0	51.0	Yes	94	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		33.0	42.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	86	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.0	16.0	-17.0	51.0	No	127	0	Below Target
High needs		34.0	16.0	-18.0	51.0	No	100	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		30.5	16.0	-14.5	51.0	No	91	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		28.0	15.0	-13.0	51.0	No	83	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	50.0	60.0	29.00	0
High needs	50.0	60.0	29.00	0
EL and Former EL	50.0	60.0	29.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	210	210	100	Yes	210	208	99	Yes	70	70	100	Yes
High needs	162	162	100	Yes	162	160	99	Yes	58	58	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	148	148	100	Yes	148	146	99	Yes	53	53	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	34	34	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	35	35	100	Yes	35	34	97	Yes	8	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	145	145	100	Yes	145	143	99	Yes	45	45	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	39	39	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes	12	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.