Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Kensington International School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Kensington International School

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Kensington International School (02810110)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.5	59.3	71.7	12.4	84.5	86.8	11	153	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		72.8	58.3	68.4	10.1	84.1	86.4	20	133	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.8	57.8	67.5	9.7	61.3	78.9	15	120	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		53.2	52.2	64.3	12.1	72.7	76.6	29	56	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		52.7	-	-	-	-	76.4	-	27	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		82.0	-	-	-	-	91.0	-	27	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		68.8	57.1	72.8	15.7	81.8	84.4	52	102	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.7	65.7	70.8	5.1	81.7	84.4	9	153	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		68.5	64.4	68.8	4.4	81.6	84.3	22	133	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.2	64.2	67.9	3.7	67.2	82.1	19	120	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		56.5	66.7	74.1	7.4	74.6	78.3	50	56	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	-	-	-	-	75.0	-	27	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		73.0	-	-	-	-	86.5	-	27	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		63.6	63.9	71.6	7.7	78.8	81.8	42	102	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.3	74.5	72.5	-2.0	82.7	85.2	27	51	25	No Change
High needs		69.9	74.4	71.7	-2.7	82.4	85.0	65	45	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.0	75.0	70.9	-4.1	77.1	87.5	66	43	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		63.0	77.1	78.0	0.9	78.4	81.5	92	33	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.4	3.9	153	25	27.1	20.9	153	25
High needs	0.8	3.8	133	25	28.3	24.1	133	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.8	4.2	120	25	28.8	24.2	120	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	5.4	56	25	37.8	32.1	56	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.1	2.9	102	25	28.4	20.6	102	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.1	12.4	153	25	19.3	20.3	153	0
High needs	2.4	9.8	133	25	21.3	23.3	133	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.5	7.5	120	25	21.2	23.3	120	0
EL and Former EL	2.2	12.5	56	25	24.4	16.1	56	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	11.8	102	25	21.1	22.5	102	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.8	7.8	51	0	6.4	17.6	51	0
High needs	11.4	6.7	45	0	6.8	20.0	45	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.2	7.0	43	0	7.9	20.9	43	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.6	9.1	33	0	0.0	12.1	33	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		26.0	62.0	36.0	51.0	Yes	95	100	Above Target
High needs		27.0	60.0	33.0	51.0	Yes	81	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		25.0	57.0	32.0	51.0	Yes	75	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	30	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		22.5	58.0	35.5	51.0	Yes	64	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.0	52.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	95	75	On Target
High needs		41.5	48.0	6.5	51.0	Yes	81	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	44.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	75	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	30	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		38.0	47.5	9.5	51.0	Yes	64	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	65.0	60.0	79.00	25
High needs	65.0	60.0	79.00	25
EL and Former EL	65.0	60.0	79.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	184	183	99	Yes	184	183	99	Yes	53	53	100	Yes
High needs	164	163	99	Yes	164	163	99	Yes	47	47	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	150	149	99	Yes	150	149	99	Yes	45	45	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	69	69	100	Yes	69	69	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	39	38	97	Yes	39	38	97	Yes	9	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	120	120	100	Yes	120	120	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	4	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.