Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Indian Orchard Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Indian Orchard Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Indian Orchard Elementary (02810100)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.8	67.0	62.5	-4.5	81.2	83.9	3	259	0	Declined
High needs		65.7	65.1	60.0	-5.1	80.0	82.9	4	223	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.8	66.8	60.6	-6.2	69.6	83.4	5	210	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		55.2	60.5	51.2	-9.3	73.9	77.6	4	41	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		42.7	40.6	44.4	3.8	66.6	71.4	7	49	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		68.2	75.0	58.7	-16.3	81.5	84.1	6	43	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		59.6	64.4	62.3	-2.1	76.4	79.8	13	159	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		77.7	71.5	64.1	-7.4	87.0	88.9	2	48	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.2	66.3	60.3	-6.0	80.3	83.1	2	244	0	Declined
High needs		63.7	64.7	59.1	-5.6	78.8	81.9	4	212	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.8	64.8	60.1	-4.7	67.7	82.4	5	198	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		51.2	59.7	50.7	-9.0	71.5	75.6	4	36	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		44.5	47.6	42.2	-5.4	67.6	72.3	6	51	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		65.3	71.2	55.0	-16.2	79.8	82.7	6	35	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		59.0	63.4	58.3	-5.1	76.1	79.5	8	156	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.0	71.5	69.3	-2.2	85.4	87.5	4	44	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.7	63.9	45.9	-18.0	77.7	80.9	3	79	0	Declined
High needs		58.3	63.7	42.5	-21.2	75.7	79.2	3	67	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.3	65.3	44.2	-21.1	68.2	82.7	7	60	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		50.0	63.3	44.2	-19.1	70.8	75.0	13	56	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	2.3	259	25	21.2	25.9	259	0
High needs	0.0	1.8	223	25	23.7	28.3	223	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	1.9	210	25	21.6	28.1	210	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	41	0	29.0	36.6	41	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	49	0	57.5	46.9	49	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	0.0	43	0	11.5	20.9	43	0
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	1.3	159	25	24.7	28.3	159	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	8.3	48	25	14.0	25.0	48	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.3	7.8	244	0	19.8	33.6	244	0
High needs	7.7	6.6	212	0	21.5	34.9	212	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.3	7.1	198	0	21.4	33.3	198	0
EL and Former EL	6.5	2.8	36	0	32.3	47.2	36	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	51	0	41.5	56.9	51	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	15.4	0.0	35	0	23.1	34.3	35	0
Hispanic/Latino	7.9	7.1	156	0	22.6	35.9	156	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.0	15.9	44	25	10.0	27.3	44	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	0.0	79	0	18.9	50.6	79	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	67	0	17.2	56.7	67	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	60	0	16.9	53.3	60	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	56	0	19.1	51.8	56	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	29.5	-17.5	51.0	No	150	0	Below Target
High needs		44.5	28.0	-16.5	51.0	No	129	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.0	27.0	-17.0	51.0	No	120	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		43.5	24.0	-19.5	51.0	No	30	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.0	28.0	-19.0	51.0	No	97	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		56.0	18.5	-37.5	51.0	No	22	0	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	24.0	-14.0	51.0	No	150	0	Below Target
High needs		38.0	25.0	-13.0	51.0	No	130	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	22.0	-16.0	51.0	No	119	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		41.5	26.5	-15.0	51.0	No	32	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		38.0	24.5	-13.5	51.0	No	98	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		55.0	16.0	-39.0	51.0	Yes	21	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	50.0	60.0	57.00	0
High needs	50.0	60.0	57.00	0
EL and Former EL	50.0	60.0	57.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	291	287	99	Yes	276	271	98	Yes	91	91	100	Yes
High needs	255	251	98	Yes	243	239	98	Yes	79	79	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	238	235	99	Yes	225	221	98	Yes	70	70	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	49	49	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes	17	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	59	57	97	Yes	59	59	100	Yes	25	25	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	45	45	100	Yes	39	38	97	Yes	13	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	186	183	98	Yes	180	178	99	Yes	65	65	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	51	50	98	Yes	48	46	96	Yes	9	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.