Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hiram L Dorman

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Hiram L Dorman

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Hiram L Dorman (02810050)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.7	70.7	71.4	0.7	80.6	83.4	10	133	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		65.3	71.2	70.0	-1.2	79.8	82.7	24	116	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.1	72.1	68.7	-3.4	74.4	86.1	19	107	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		57.4	63.8	61.0	-2.8	75.2	78.7	40	25	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		60.3	-	71.9	-4.5	76.8	80.2	42	32	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		71.5	67.2	67.6	0.4	83.4	85.8	28	78	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.2	71.8	75.6	3.8	82.6	85.1	16	133	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		69.5	72.8	73.5	0.7	82.2	84.8	40	116	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.8	72.8	73.1	0.3	75.1	86.4	36	107	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.0	68.0	57.0	-11.0	77.3	80.5	28	25	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		62.2	-	78.9	2.5	78.0	81.1	75	32	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		71.5	70.5	71.8	1.3	83.4	85.8	43	78	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.4	63.7	52.0	-11.7	76.3	79.7	7	37	0	Declined
High needs		58.9	64.4	50.8	-13.6	76.0	79.5	12	32	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.8	68.8	52.8	-16.0	71.4	84.4	23	27	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		60.0	60.5	48.9	-11.6	76.7	80.0	23	23	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.4	2.3	133	0	14.5	16.5	133	0
High needs	4.0	2.6	116	0	15.2	17.2	116	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.5	2.8	107	0	13.5	18.7	107	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	25	0	31.0	32.0	25	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5.4	0.0	32	0	16.2	6.3	32	25
Hispanic/Latino	2.1	1.3	78	0	17.7	23.1	78	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.6	17.3	133	25	17.4	18.8	133	0
High needs	9.7	15.5	116	25	16.8	21.6	116	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.9	16.8	107	25	16.8	21.5	107	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	25	0	24.0	48.0	25	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	16.2	31.3	32	25	10.8	12.5	32	0
Hispanic/Latino	10.1	7.7	78	0	16.9	24.4	78	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.9	0.0	37	0	23.5	43.2	37	0
High needs	4.4	0.0	32	0	22.2	46.9	32	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.0	0.0	27	0	15.0	44.4	27	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	23	0	28.9	47.8	23	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	49.0	6.0	51.0	No	81	50	Below Target
High needs		47.0	47.5	0.5	51.0	No	70	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.5	44.0	-2.5	51.0	No	65	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		38.5	43.0	4.5	51.0	No	50	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.5	64.5	-4.0	51.0	Yes	82	100	Above Target
High needs		68.0	65.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	71	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.0	64.5	-0.5	51.0	Yes	66	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		66.0	62.5	-3.5	51.0	Yes	50	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	67.0	60.0	24.00	25
High needs	67.0	60.0	24.00	25
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	24.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	144	144	100	Yes	145	145	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
High needs	126	126	100	Yes	127	127	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	117	117	100	Yes	118	118	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	17	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	28	28	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	35	35	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	86	86	100	Yes	87	87	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	6	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.