Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Floral Street School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Floral Street School

Organization Information
District:Shrewsbury (02710000)School type:Elementary School
School:Floral Street School (02710020)Grades served:01,02,03,04
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.6, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.6, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.6, Target = 96.3 93.6 94.6 92.6 -2.0 96.3 96.8 8238475On Target
High needsCPI = 82.9, Target = 90.6CPI = 82.9, Target = 90.6CPI = 82.9, Target = 90.6 83.9 87.1 82.9 -4.2 90.6 92.0 811200Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.3, Target = 90.8CPI = 86.3, Target = 90.8CPI = 86.3, Target = 90.8 90.0 90.0 86.3 -3.7 90.8 95.0 89420Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 90.6, Target = 90.4CPI = 90.6, Target = 90.4 83.6 93.2 90.6 -2.6 90.4 91.8 965675On Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.2, Target = 87CPI = 68.2, Target = 87CPI = 68.2, Target = 87 77.7 77.6 68.2 -9.4 87.0 88.9 61440Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 97.2, Target = 96.5CPI = 97.2, Target = 96.5 94.0 98.2 97.2 -1.0 96.5 97.0 85170100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino  86.3---- 93.2-31--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.3, Target = 96.8CPI = 88.3, Target = 96.8CPI = 88.3, Target = 96.8 94.5 92.5 88.3 -4.2 96.8 97.3 501560Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.5, Target = 96CPI = 93.5, Target = 96CPI = 93.5, Target = 96 93.1 92.7 93.5 0.8 96.0 96.6 8738375On Target
High needsCPI = 86, Target = 90.1CPI = 86, Target = 90.1CPI = 86, Target = 90.1 83.0 82.2 86.0 3.8 90.1 91.5 8912050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 83.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 83.3, Target = 88.3 87.2 87.2 83.3 -3.9 88.3 93.6 79420Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 94.6, Target = 93.5CPI = 94.6, Target = 93.5CPI = 94.6, Target = 93.5 88.8 90.0 94.6 4.6 93.5 94.4 9656100Above Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71, Target = 85.7CPI = 71, Target = 85.7CPI = 71, Target = 85.7 75.4 69.9 71.0 1.1 85.7 87.7 674450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 99.3, Target = 98.3CPI = 99.3, Target = 98.3 97.0 98.5 99.3 0.8 98.3 98.5 91169100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino  85.0---- 92.5-31--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.9 93.0 88.5 89.1 0.6 95.9 96.5 5615650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 35.8 31.33840 2.0 2.33840
High needs 15.8 15.01200 7.0 6.71200
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.0 19.04225 7.5 4.84225
EL and Former EL 29.5 19.6560 2.3 3.6560
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 4.5440 14.3 15.9440
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 51.7 40.61700 0.7 0.017025
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--31---31-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.4 24.41560 3.6 5.11560
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 56.2 62.738325 4.1 3.138325
High needs 35.7 39.21200 11.3 7.512025
Econ. Disadvantaged 29.3 38.14225 7.3 4.84225
EL and Former EL 53.3 58.95625 2.2 0.05625
Students w/ disabilities 20.4 9.1440 24.5 20.54425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 78.1 82.21690 0.7 0.016925
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--31---31-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.8 51.315625 6.7 5.815625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 72.0 48.0 -24.0 51.0No19850Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 62.0 44.0 -18.0 51.0No6150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-27--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
AsianSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 79.0 59.0 -20.0 51.0No8375On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 69.0 34.0 -35.0 51.0No8525Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 67.0 53.0 -14.0 51.0Yes19775On Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 61.0 37.5 -23.5 51.0Yes6075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-26--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
AsianSGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51 79.0 71.5 -7.5 51.0Yes82100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 56.5 45.0 -11.5 51.0No8550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 80.0 60.03425
High needs 80.0 60.03425
EL and Former EL 80.0 60.03425
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students40039699Yes400399100Yes----
High needs12612398Yes127127100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged444398Yes4545100Yes----
EL and Former EL615895Yes6262100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities4747100Yes4848100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian17717498Yes176176100Yes----
Afr. Amer./Black14---15-------
Hispanic/Latino3333100Yes3333100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16116099Yes16116099Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles