Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cottage Street
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Cottage Street
Organization Information
District:Sharon (02660000)School type:Elementary School
School:Cottage Street (02660005)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 96.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 96.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 96.8 94.5 93.2 92.7 -0.5 96.8 97.3 8328375On Target
High needsCPI = 83.2, Target = 91.5CPI = 83.2, Target = 91.5CPI = 83.2, Target = 91.5 85.5 81.8 83.2 1.4 91.5 92.8 828250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former ELCPI = 82.3, Target = 87.8CPI = 82.3, Target = 87.8CPI = 82.3, Target = 87.8 85.4 75.9 82.3 6.4 87.8 92.7 833150Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.5, Target = 87.9CPI = 78.5, Target = 87.9CPI = 78.5, Target = 87.9 79.3 81.0 78.5 -2.5 87.9 89.7 8643--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 95.5, Target = 98.4CPI = 95.5, Target = 98.4CPI = 95.5, Target = 98.4 97.3 92.7 95.5 2.8 98.4 98.7 6673100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 97.1CPI = 92.4, Target = 97.1CPI = 92.4, Target = 97.1 95.0 94.6 92.4 -2.2 97.1 97.5 7517575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 94.7CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.7CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.7 90.9 93.2 92.7 -0.5 94.7 95.5 8328175On Target
High needsCPI = 83, Target = 84.5CPI = 83, Target = 84.5CPI = 83, Target = 84.5 73.5 83.5 83.0 -0.5 84.5 86.8 808125No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former ELCPI = 89.2, Target = 89.8CPI = 89.2, Target = 89.8 88.9 88.9 89.2 0.3 89.8 94.5 893075On Target
Students w/ disabilities  66.4---- 83.2-43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 99, Target = 98.4CPI = 99, Target = 98.4 97.3 96.0 99.0 3.0 98.4 98.7 8772100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 91.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 91.7, Target = 94.9 91.3 94.3 91.7 -2.6 94.9 95.7 731750Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.4, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.4, Target = 96.3 93.7 92.6 92.4 -0.2 96.3 96.9 91102100Above Target
High needs  83.3---- 91.7-31--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  89.8---- 94.9-22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 96.4CPI = 93.8, Target = 96.4CPI = 93.8, Target = 96.4 93.9 95.3 93.8 -1.5 96.4 97.0 9164100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.1 24.72830 1.5 1.82830
High needs 11.0 4.9820 5.5 4.98225
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL 11.1 6.5310 11.1 0.03125
Students w/ disabilities 8.0 4.743- 0.0 9.343-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 35.5 34.2730 1.6 0.07325
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.9 21.11750 0.6 2.91750
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 52.2 54.12810 1.5 5.02810
High needs 31.0 24.7810 5.6 14.8810
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL 37.0 30.0300 3.7 6.7300
Students w/ disabilities--43---43-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 75.8 79.2720 0.0 0.07225
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.3 47.41750 1.7 5.71750
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 36.2 43.110225 3.2 0.010225
High needs--31---31-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.8 45.36425 0.0 0.06425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 62.5 48.5 -14.0 51.0No18050Below Target
High needsSGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 52.0 43.5 -8.5 51.0Yes5275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-21--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 54.0 55.0 1.0 51.0Yes4475On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 63.5 48.5 -15.0 51.0No11450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 74.0 55.0 -19.0 51.0No17675On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 67.0 55.0 -12.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-20--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51 76.0 73.0 -3.0 51.0Yes43100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 74.5 51.5 -23.0 51.0No11275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 85.0 60.02625
High needs 85.0 60.02625
EL and Former EL 85.0 60.02625
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students30229598Yes30229397Yes104104100Yes
High needs888799Yes888698Yes3333100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---10---
EL and Former EL3232100Yes323197Yes13---
Students w/ disabilities464598Yes464598Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7777100Yes777699Yes2323100Yes
Afr. Amer./Black11---11---5---
Hispanic/Latino12---12---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18918296Yes18918296Yes6565100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles