Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Seekonk High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Seekonk High
Organization Information
District:Seekonk (02650000)School type:High School
School:Seekonk High (02650505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.8, Target = 98.2CPI = 99.8, Target = 98.2CPI = 99.8, Target = 98.2 96.9 99.1 99.8 0.7 98.2 98.5 94134100Above Target
High needsCPI = 99.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 99.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 99.3, Target = 94.9 91.3 98.0 99.3 1.3 94.9 95.7 9636100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.8, Target = 98.2CPI = 99.8, Target = 98.2CPI = 99.8, Target = 98.2 96.9 99.0 99.8 0.8 98.2 98.5 87127100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.4, Target = 94.8CPI = 94.4, Target = 94.8 91.1 93.6 94.4 0.8 94.8 95.6 6313575On Target
High needsCPI = 85.1, Target = 88CPI = 85.1, Target = 88CPI = 85.1, Target = 88 79.4 82.7 85.1 2.4 88.0 89.7 633750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------25--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 94.3, Target = 94.9 91.3 93.6 94.3 0.7 94.9 95.7 5212875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.6, Target = 95.6CPI = 97.6, Target = 95.6CPI = 97.6, Target = 95.6 92.5 93.0 97.6 4.6 95.6 96.3 88125100Above Target
High needsCPI = 94.4, Target = 91.8CPI = 94.4, Target = 91.8CPI = 94.4, Target = 91.8 85.9 80.3 94.4 14.1 91.8 93.0 9531100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.7, Target = 95.5CPI = 97.7, Target = 95.5CPI = 97.7, Target = 95.5 92.3 93.3 97.7 4.4 95.5 96.2 82119100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 62.8 65.71340 0.0 0.013425
High needs 26.3 38.93625 0.0 0.03625
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 63.6 65.41270 0.0 0.012725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 51.8 60.013525 2.2 3.71350
High needs 20.5 32.43725 7.7 13.5370
Econ. Disadvantaged--25---25-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 51.9 59.412825 2.3 3.91280
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.6 41.61250 2.3 0.012525
High needs 7.9 25.83125 7.9 0.03125
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.1 40.31190 1.6 0.011925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 56.0 53.5 -2.5 51.0Yes12275On Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 46.0 38.0 -8.0 51.0Yes3075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 59.0 54.0 -5.0 51.0Yes11775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 35.0 36.0 1.0 51.0Yes12375On Target
High needsSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 29.0 29.0 0.0 51.0Yes3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 35.0 34.5 -0.5 51.0Yes11875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80 96.8 94.4 -2.4 80.0 90.014475On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 87.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.8, Target = 80 91.5 87.8 -3.7 80.0 90.04175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.019--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 80 96.6 95.5 -1.1 80.0 90.0134100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 97.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.3, Target = 85 96.6 97.3 0.7 85.0 95.0186100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 85 93.3 93.2 -0.1 85.0 95.05975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.027--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.04--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 85 97.8 97.2 -0.6 85.0 95.0179100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.7, Target = 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.7 -0.1 0.8 0.76256675On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 0.8 1.4 1.9 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.77211450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------49--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------74--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.8, Target = 0.9 1.5 0.7 0.8 -0.1 0.9 0.84952575On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13913899Yes139139100Yes14013999Yes
High needs414098Yes4141100Yes424198Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged27---2727100Yes28---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities22---22---22---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---2---
Afr. Amer./Black--------1---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13113099Yes131131100Yes13113099Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles