Massachusetts School and District Profiles

George R Martin

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - George R Martin

Organization Information
District:Seekonk (02650000)School type:Elementary School
School:George R Martin (02650007)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.9, Target = 92.8 87.6 83.3 83.9 0.6 92.8 93.8 4226050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 64.9, Target = 85.2CPI = 64.9, Target = 85.2CPI = 64.9, Target = 85.2 74.7 69.3 64.9 -4.4 85.2 87.4 10940Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.5, Target = 79.1CPI = 76.5, Target = 79.1CPI = 76.5, Target = 79.1 77.2 77.2 76.5 -0.7 79.1 88.6 495025No Change
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 52.9, Target = 79.4CPI = 52.9, Target = 79.4CPI = 52.9, Target = 79.4 64.7 60.9 52.9 -8.0 79.4 82.4 19510Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.9, Target = 93.4CPI = 83.9, Target = 93.4CPI = 83.9, Target = 93.4 88.6 83.0 83.9 0.9 93.4 94.3 2722250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.2, Target = 92CPI = 88.2, Target = 92CPI = 88.2, Target = 92 86.3 87.2 88.2 1.0 92.0 93.2 6325950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.4, Target = 86.7CPI = 73.4, Target = 86.7CPI = 73.4, Target = 86.7 77.2 75.3 73.4 -1.9 86.7 88.6 399425No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85, Target = 84.1CPI = 85, Target = 84.1 82.6 82.6 85.0 2.4 84.1 91.3 855075On Target
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.7, Target = 81.7CPI = 62.7, Target = 81.7CPI = 62.7, Target = 81.7 68.6 63.3 62.7 -0.6 81.7 84.3 445125No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.2, Target = 92.8CPI = 88.2, Target = 92.8CPI = 88.2, Target = 92.8 87.6 86.9 88.2 1.3 92.8 93.8 5222150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86, Target = 92CPI = 86, Target = 92CPI = 86, Target = 92 86.2 78.8 86.0 7.2 92.0 93.1 678950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.2, Target = 86CPI = 80.2, Target = 86CPI = 80.2, Target = 86 76.0 65.6 80.2 14.6 86.0 88.0 882450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.5, Target = 92.1CPI = 86.5, Target = 92.1CPI = 86.5, Target = 92.1 86.5 79.2 86.5 7.3 92.1 93.3 577650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.2 7.72600 7.4 8.82600
High needs 1.1 1.1940 20.5 24.5940
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.05025 10.9 12.0500
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 2.2 0.0510 34.8 37.3510
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.6 8.12220 7.7 9.52220
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.7 35.925925 4.5 6.62590
High needs 12.6 10.6940 11.5 18.1940
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.4 16.0500 8.7 4.05025
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 8.9 3.9510 17.8 29.4510
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.2 38.022125 4.9 7.22210
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 16.5 15.7890 11.4 3.48925
High needs 3.1 4.22425 25.0 8.32425
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.2 15.8760 10.6 1.37625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 36.0 46.0 10.0 51.0Yes16175On Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 35.0 37.5 2.5 51.0No5850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 33.0 45.5 12.5 51.0No3475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 24, Target = 51SGP = 24, Target = 51SGP = 24, Target = 51 35.0 24.0 -11.0 51.0No320Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 34.0 42.0 8.0 51.0Yes13875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 46.0 53.5 7.5 51.0Yes16075On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 47.0 49.0 2.0 51.0No5850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 49.0 57.0 8.0 51.0Yes3475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 34.0 42.5 8.5 51.0Yes3275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 40.0 55.0 15.0 51.0Yes137100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.015-
High needs- 60.015-
EL and Former EL- 60.015-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students268268100Yes267267100Yes9191100Yes
High needs9999100Yes9999100Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5454100Yes5454100Yes15---
EL and Former EL16---16---3---
Students w/ disabilities5353100Yes5353100Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian9---9---2---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---2---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White229229100Yes228228100Yes7878100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles