Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Jenkins Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Jenkins Elementary School

Organization Information
District:Scituate (02640000)School type:Elementary School
School:Jenkins Elementary School (02640015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.1, Target = 96.2CPI = 92.1, Target = 96.2CPI = 92.1, Target = 96.2 93.5 91.0 92.1 1.1 96.2 96.8 7932150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.6, Target = 87.3CPI = 77.6, Target = 87.3CPI = 77.6, Target = 87.3 78.2 69.2 77.6 8.4 87.3 89.1 606750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.8, Target = 74.3CPI = 81.8, Target = 74.3CPI = 81.8, Target = 74.3 72.0 72.0 81.8 9.8 74.3 86.0 7437100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.9, Target = 85.1CPI = 70.9, Target = 85.1CPI = 70.9, Target = 85.1 74.4 60.1 70.9 10.8 85.1 87.2 673750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.2, Target = 96.6CPI = 92.2, Target = 96.6CPI = 92.2, Target = 96.6 94.2 91.4 92.2 0.8 96.6 97.1 7430375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 94.6CPI = 91.7, Target = 94.6CPI = 91.7, Target = 94.6 90.8 88.9 91.7 2.8 94.6 95.4 7832150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.5, Target = 85.2CPI = 73.5, Target = 85.2CPI = 73.5, Target = 85.2 74.6 64.3 73.5 9.2 85.2 87.3 406750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.1, Target = 76.5CPI = 85.1, Target = 76.5CPI = 85.1, Target = 76.5 74.4 74.4 85.1 10.7 76.5 87.2 8537100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.8, Target = 82.1CPI = 58.8, Target = 82.1CPI = 58.8, Target = 82.1 69.3 52.2 58.8 6.6 82.1 84.7 333750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.9, Target = 95.1CPI = 91.9, Target = 95.1CPI = 91.9, Target = 95.1 91.6 89.3 91.9 2.6 95.1 95.8 7430350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93, Target = 94.3CPI = 93, Target = 94.3CPI = 93, Target = 94.3 90.2 90.0 93.0 3.0 94.3 95.1 9397100Above Target
High needs  88.0---- 94.0-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 94.2CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.2CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.2 90.0 90.2 93.1 2.9 94.2 95.0 8994100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 15.3 18.732125 5.2 2.232125
High needs 1.4 6.06725 23.3 7.56725
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.4 8.13725 19.5 5.43725
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.73725 34.0 10.83725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.9 19.530325 4.9 2.330325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.8 43.332125 5.6 4.432125
High needs 10.0 11.96725 25.7 17.96725
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.3 18.93725 17.9 8.13725
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 5.4370 37.0 32.43725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.5 43.930325 5.3 4.030325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 27.1 38.19725 3.5 1.09725
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.6 37.29425 2.5 1.19425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 47.0 48.0 1.0 51.0No24050Below Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 32.0 41.0 9.0 51.0Yes5275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 33.0 34.0 1.0 51.0Yes2975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 29.0 45.5 16.5 51.0Yes28100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 47.0 48.0 1.0 51.0No22850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 45.5 46.0 0.5 51.0Yes23575On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 36.0 46.0 10.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 38.0 50.0 12.0 51.0Yes2975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 34.0 40.0 6.0 51.0Yes2775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 45.5 46.0 0.5 51.0Yes22375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students33032699Yes33132799Yes9898100Yes
High needs716896Yes726996Yes2020100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3737100Yes3838100Yes13---
EL and Former EL3---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities403794No403793No10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black9---9-------
Hispanic/Latino3---3---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White30930599Yes31030699Yes9494100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles