Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Horace Mann Laboratory
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Horace Mann Laboratory
Organization Information
District:Salem (02580000)School type:Elementary School
School:Horace Mann Laboratory (02580030)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.5, Target = 84.4CPI = 80.5, Target = 84.4CPI = 80.5, Target = 84.4 73.3 76.0 80.5 4.5 84.4 86.7 2911350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72, Target = 77.7CPI = 72, Target = 77.7CPI = 72, Target = 77.7 61.8 67.5 72.0 4.5 77.7 80.9 326750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.7, Target = 72.6CPI = 71.7, Target = 72.6 70.1 70.1 71.7 1.6 72.6 85.1 276075On Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 75.6, Target = 71.5CPI = 75.6, Target = 71.5CPI = 75.6, Target = 71.5 51.2 71.5 75.6 4.1 71.5 75.6 6239100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.8, Target = 91.3CPI = 85.8, Target = 91.3CPI = 85.8, Target = 91.3 85.0 81.5 85.8 4.3 91.3 92.5 375350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.3, Target = 81.6CPI = 76.3, Target = 81.6CPI = 76.3, Target = 81.6 68.4 72.4 76.3 3.9 81.6 84.2 1811350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 64.9, Target = 74.1CPI = 64.9, Target = 74.1CPI = 64.9, Target = 74.1 55.6 61.3 64.9 3.6 74.1 77.8 126750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.3, Target = 66.5CPI = 63.3, Target = 66.5CPI = 63.3, Target = 66.5 63.4 63.4 63.3 -0.1 66.5 81.7 96025No Change
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 67.9, Target = 69.8CPI = 67.9, Target = 69.8CPI = 67.9, Target = 69.8 48.3 65.3 67.9 2.6 69.8 74.2 313950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 88.5 80.3 82.5 84.4 1.9 88.5 90.2 315350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75, Target = 79.6CPI = 75, Target = 79.6CPI = 75, Target = 79.6 65.1 68.0 75.0 7.0 79.6 82.6 343850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.9, Target = 73.5CPI = 67.9, Target = 73.5CPI = 67.9, Target = 73.5 54.6 57.0 67.9 10.9 73.5 77.3 502150Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  79.6---- 89.8-20--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.8 11.511325 17.6 11.511325
High needs 3.6 6.06725 26.5 16.46725
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.2 6.76025 21.1 16.76025
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino 6.0 5.1390 18.0 15.43925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.0 18.95325 12.0 7.55325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.2 23.911325 21.8 19.511325
High needs 7.3 4.5670 32.9 31.3670
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.6 5.0600 31.0 33.3600
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino 14.3 2.6390 28.6 28.2390
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.0 41.55325 12.0 13.2530
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.0 13.2380 20.0 13.23825
High needs 9.4 4.8210 31.3 19.02125
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--20---20-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 49.0 59.0 10.0 51.0Yes6575On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 51.0 55.0 4.0 51.0No3875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 51.0 54.0 3.0 51.0No3575On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 51.5 62.0 10.5 51.0Yes31100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51 56.5 52.5 -4.0 51.0Yes6475On Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 53.0 42.0 -11.0 51.0No3750Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 53.0 40.5 -12.5 51.0No3450Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 53.0 56.0 3.0 51.0Yes3175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12612599Yes12612599Yes3939100Yes
High needs797899Yes797899Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged696899Yes696899Yes19---
EL and Former EL19---19---8---
Students w/ disabilities19---19---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black13---13---3---
Hispanic/Latino464598Yes464598Yes11---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White5858100Yes5858100Yes2020100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles