Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nathaniel Bowditch

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - Nathaniel Bowditch

Organization Information

District:

Salem (02580000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Nathaniel Bowditch (02580025)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.7	65.2	67.7	2.5	84.1	86.4	15	306	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		66.4	58.7	62.2	3.5	80.4	83.2	11	232	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.9	59.9	63.8	3.9	63.2	80.0	12	187	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		51.2	46.0	54.8	8.8	71.5	75.6	14	121	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		48.6	43.9	42.7	-1.2	70.0	74.3	10	41	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		64.5	57.1	64.2	7.1	79.3	82.3	14	204	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.1	79.2	75.9	-3.3	89.6	91.1	8	79	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.4	54.9	54.4	-0.5	78.7	81.7	8	304	25	No Change
High needs		56.6	48.2	47.5	-0.7	74.7	78.3	5	230	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.1	50.1	49.9	-0.2	54.3	75.1	5	185	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		45.0	39.3	41.8	2.5	67.9	72.5	3	122	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		40.5	33.0	31.4	-1.6	65.3	70.3	5	39	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		52.7	46.8	48.4	1.6	72.4	76.4	3	202	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		76.9	69.3	65.5	-3.8	86.5	88.5	5	79	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.7	52.1	51.2	-0.9	73.0	76.9	20	107	25	No Change
High needs		47.6	44.6	42.5	-2.1	69.4	73.8	12	83	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.0	46.0	46.2	0.2	50.5	73.0	27	59	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		31.6	34.2	34.4	0.2	43.0	65.8	14	48	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		45.8	42.7	43.2	0.5	68.4	72.9	16	73	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		63.1	70.0	68.8	-1.2	78.5	81.6	22	28	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.3	3.3	306	0	25.8	21.6	306	25
High needs	3.0	1.7	232	0	32.6	26.3	232	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.3	2.1	187	0	33.0	24.6	187	25
EL and Former EL	0.7	0.0	121	0	45.7	35.5	121	25
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	0.0	41	0	56.6	48.8	41	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.1	2.5	204	0	34.8	25.5	204	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	7.9	6.3	79	0	10.9	11.4	79	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.0	7.6	304	0	41.0	42.1	304	0
High needs	4.2	3.0	230	0	49.2	50.4	230	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.8	3.8	185	0	47.8	45.9	185	0
EL and Former EL	1.4	2.5	122	25	61.6	60.7	122	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	0.0	39	0	71.7	74.4	39	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.7	3.0	202	25	53.1	49.5	202	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.8	16.5	79	0	19.8	27.8	79	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.8	2.8	107	25	40.6	41.1	107	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	83	0	47.8	50.6	83	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	59	0	45.3	40.7	59	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	48	0	69.4	66.7	48	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	73	0	51.2	52.1	73	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2.5	7.1	28	25	17.5	21.4	28	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.0	55.0	10.0	51.0	No	236	75	On Target
High needs		46.0	52.0	6.0	51.0	No	176	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.5	49.0	5.5	51.0	No	142	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		51.0	56.0	5.0	51.0	No	90	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		33.5	53.0	19.5	51.0	No	31	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		44.0	53.5	9.5	51.0	Yes	158	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		45.0	60.0	15.0	51.0	No	62	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		37.0	37.0	0.0	51.0	No	235	25	Below Target
High needs		38.0	37.0	-1.0	51.0	No	175	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		36.0	37.0	1.0	51.0	No	141	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		39.0	39.5	0.5	51.0	No	92	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		41.5	33.0	-8.5	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		36.0	37.0	1.0	51.0	No	156	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		43.0	34.0	-9.0	51.0	No	63	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	42.0	60.0	135.00	0
High needs	42.0	60.0	135.00	0
EL and Former EL	42.0	60.0	135.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	350	348	99	Yes	350	346	99	Yes	128	126	98	Yes
High needs	276	274	99	Yes	276	272	99	Yes	104	102	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	221	219	99	Yes	221	217	98	Yes	74	73	99	Yes
EL and Former EL	164	162	99	Yes	164	163	99	Yes	67	67	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	43	43	100	Yes	43	41	95	Yes	17	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	244	242	99	Yes	244	240	98	Yes	90	90	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	83	83	100	Yes	83	83	100	Yes	31	30	97	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.