Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bates
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bates
Organization Information
District:Salem (02580000)School type:Elementary School
School:Bates (02580003)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.8, Target = 85.9CPI = 79.8, Target = 85.9CPI = 79.8, Target = 85.9 75.9 76.4 79.8 3.4 85.9 88.0 2713150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.1, Target = 82.4CPI = 71.1, Target = 82.4CPI = 71.1, Target = 82.4 69.8 67.8 71.1 3.3 82.4 84.9 297050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.2, Target = 69.6CPI = 70.2, Target = 69.6 66.8 66.8 70.2 3.4 69.6 83.4 236275On Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilities  55.9---- 78.0-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 76.9, Target = 84.7CPI = 76.9, Target = 84.7CPI = 76.9, Target = 84.7 73.8 72.7 76.9 4.2 84.7 86.9 683950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.5, Target = 86.5CPI = 82.5, Target = 86.5CPI = 82.5, Target = 86.5 76.9 79.8 82.5 2.7 86.5 88.5 217750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.1, Target = 85.5CPI = 82.1, Target = 85.5CPI = 82.1, Target = 85.5 75.2 79.8 82.1 2.3 85.5 87.6 3413050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.7, Target = 80.9CPI = 70.7, Target = 80.9CPI = 70.7, Target = 80.9 67.3 69.6 70.7 1.1 80.9 83.7 286950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.5, Target = 72CPI = 70.5, Target = 72CPI = 70.5, Target = 72 69.4 69.4 70.5 1.1 72.0 84.7 276150Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilities  52.1---- 76.1-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 77.6, Target = 81.9CPI = 77.6, Target = 81.9CPI = 77.6, Target = 81.9 68.9 75.8 77.6 1.8 81.9 84.5 683950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.2, Target = 86.9CPI = 85.2, Target = 86.9CPI = 85.2, Target = 86.9 77.6 81.7 85.2 3.5 86.9 88.8 347650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 70.6, Target = 83.8CPI = 70.6, Target = 83.8CPI = 70.6, Target = 83.8 72.3 77.6 70.6 -7.0 83.8 86.2 24400Declined
High needsCPI = 61.9, Target = 79.1CPI = 61.9, Target = 79.1CPI = 61.9, Target = 79.1 64.2 69.0 61.9 -7.1 79.1 82.1 32210Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.1, Target = 84.3CPI = 76.1, Target = 84.3CPI = 76.1, Target = 84.3 73.1 85.2 76.1 -9.1 84.3 86.6 18220Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.3 3.81310 15.4 9.213125
High needs 5.8 0.0700 26.1 17.17025
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.6 0.0620 27.9 17.76225
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 2.63925 15.6 5.13925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.5 3.9770 14.1 10.47725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.5 23.11300 13.7 11.513025
High needs 21.4 11.6690 24.3 21.76925
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.6 13.1610 24.2 24.6610
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino 15.2 17.93925 15.2 12.83925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.2 26.3760 12.8 10.57625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.1 12.5400 13.2 10.04025
High needs 12.0 0.0210 20.0 14.32125
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.6 13.6220 7.4 9.1220
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 52.0 48.0 -4.0 51.0No8550Below Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 50.0 47.0 -3.0 51.0No4450Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 51.5 47.0 -4.5 51.0No3950Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 50.0 47.0 -3.0 51.0No5150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 68.5 62.0 -6.5 51.0No85100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 70.0 62.0 -8.0 51.0No44100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 74.5 56.0 -18.5 51.0No3975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-28--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 66.0 55.0 -11.0 51.0No5075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14013999Yes14013899Yes4444100Yes
High needs767599Yes767497Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged676699Yes676597Yes20---
EL and Former EL14---14---4---
Students w/ disabilities323197Yes323197Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black12---12---4---
Hispanic/Latino3939100Yes3939100Yes14---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White848399Yes848298Yes2626100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles