Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wood End Elementary School

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Wood End Elementary School

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.8, Target = 93 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90.8, Target = 93 75 or Higher All Students 88.0 89.2 90.8 1.6 93.0 94.0 7416350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.6, Target = 82.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75.6, Target = 82.2 75 or Higher High needs 69.4 74.0 75.6 1.6 82.2 84.7 484250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.7, Target = 81.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 72.7, Target = 81.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 67.8 65.9 72.7 6.8 81.2 83.9 723250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.2, Target = 93.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.2, Target = 93.4 75 or Higher White 88.7 88.9 91.2 2.3 93.4 94.4 6813450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.3, Target = 94.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.3, Target = 94.2 75 or Higher All Students 90.1 92.5 88.3 -4.2 94.2 95.1 631630Declined
High needsCPI = 70.8, Target = 84.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 70.8, Target = 84.8 75 or Higher High needs 74.0 78.1 70.8 -7.3 84.8 87.0 28420Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.2, Target = 83.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 67.2, Target = 83.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 71.1 71.2 67.2 -4.0 83.1 85.6 59320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.4, Target = 94.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.4, Target = 94.5 75 or Higher White 90.6 92.7 89.4 -3.3 94.5 95.3 581340Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.4, Target = 95.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90.4, Target = 95.7 75 or Higher All Students 92.7 88.7 90.4 1.7 95.7 96.4 855775On Target
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.3, Target = 95.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.3, Target = 95.7 75 or Higher White 92.6 87.9 91.3 3.4 95.7 96.3 824675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.3 14.71630 3.7 4.31630
High needs 8.3 2.4420 10.4 16.7420
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0320 15.2 18.8320
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.4 13.41340 4.5 3.713425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 36.5 39.91630 2.1 6.11630
High needs 10.4 14.34225 8.3 23.8420
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 12.53225 12.1 28.1320
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.0 39.613425 1.3 5.21340
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.3 19.3570 3.1 1.85725
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.4 21.7460 3.6 0.04625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 62.0 53.0 -9.0 51.0Yes11875On Target
High needsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 45.0 44.5 -0.5 51.0No2850Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 59.0 52.5 -6.5 51.0Yes9475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 81.0 53.0 -28.0 51.0No11875On Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 42, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 77.0 42.0 -35.0 51.0No2850Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 83.0 57.5 -25.5 51.0No9475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04.00-
High needs- 60.04.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.04.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students167167100Yes167167100Yes5858100Yes
High needs4545100Yes4545100Yes15---
Econ. Disadvantaged14---14---4---
EL and Former EL4---4---2---
Students w/ disabilities3434100Yes3434100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---4---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---2---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White138138100Yes138138100Yes4747100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles