Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Broad Meadows Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Broad Meadows Middle

Organization Information

District:

Quincy (02430000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Broad Meadows Middle (02430310)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.3	82.3	83.4	1.1	83.8	91.2	24	337	75	On Target
High needs		73.9	73.9	74.6	0.7	76.1	87.0	23	194	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.7	78.7	80.6	1.9	80.5	89.4	34	133	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		64.6	-	-	-	-	82.3	-	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		57.5	57.5	60.3	2.8	61.0	78.8	24	109	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		82.4	82.4	85.3	2.9	83.9	91.2	8	58	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		85.0	85.0	84.8	-0.2	86.3	92.5	15	230	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.7	66.7	70.3	3.6	69.5	83.4	21	337	75	On Target
High needs		57.0	57.0	59.4	2.4	60.6	78.5	29	195	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		62.7	62.7	67.9	5.2	65.8	81.4	49	133	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		53.0	53.0	65.0	12.0	56.9	76.5	68	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.9	37.9	40.9	3.0	43.1	69.0	18	110	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		77.5	77.5	76.3	-1.2	79.4	88.8	7	58	25	No Change
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		68.3	68.3	71.5	3.2	70.9	84.2	11	230	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.4	69.4	53.8	-15.6	72.0	84.7	10	91	0	Declined
High needs		62.0	62.0	50.8	-11.2	65.2	81.0	14	59	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.1	68.1	49.4	-18.7	70.8	84.1	15	42	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.7	40.7	45.3	4.6	45.6	70.4	25	37	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		71.7	71.7	54.5	-17.2	74.1	85.9	2	61	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.8	11.0	337	0	12.5	11.0	337	25
High needs	7.8	5.2	194	0	18.9	18.6	194	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.7	7.5	133	0	14.1	11.3	133	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	109	0	35.8	31.2	109	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	14.8	10.3	58	0	11.5	10.3	58	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	13.3	11.7	230	0	10.2	9.6	230	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.8	12.2	337	0	29.5	23.4	337	25
High needs	8.2	7.2	195	0	44.2	37.9	195	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.3	9.0	133	0	35.1	26.3	133	25
EL and Former EL	8.0	8.0	25	-	48.0	28.0	25	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.9	110	25	72.0	64.5	110	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	24.6	13.8	58	0	21.3	19.0	58	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	10.2	13.9	230	25	26.1	20.4	230	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.8	0.0	91	0	20.5	30.8	91	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	59	0	33.3	42.4	59	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	42	0	25.5	45.2	42	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	37	0	65.7	56.8	37	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	2.6	0.0	61	0	15.8	29.5	61	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	60.0	11.0	51.0	No	313	100	Above Target
High needs		48.5	59.0	10.5	51.0	No	175	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	60.5	10.5	51.0	Yes	120	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	49.5	9.5	51.0	No	92	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		64.0	69.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	55	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	58.0	11.0	51.0	No	216	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.0	50.0	6.0	51.0	No	315	50	Below Target
High needs		40.0	46.5	6.5	51.0	No	178	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.0	54.0	13.0	51.0	No	121	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		33.0	38.5	5.5	51.0	No	94	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		48.0	55.0	7.0	51.0	No	55	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.0	47.0	5.0	51.0	No	217	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	12.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	12.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	12.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	346	345	100	Yes	346	345	100	Yes	94	92	98	Yes
High needs	202	201	100	Yes	202	202	100	Yes	61	59	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	138	138	100	Yes	138	138	100	Yes	43	42	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	26	26	100	Yes	26	26	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	112	111	99	Yes	112	112	100	Yes	39	37	95	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	60	60	100	Yes	60	60	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	235	234	100	Yes	235	234	100	Yes	63	62	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.