Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wollaston School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Wollaston School

Organization Information

District:

Quincy (02430000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Wollaston School (02430110)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.7	88.7	87.7	-1.0	91.1	92.4	60	166	25	No Change
High needs		78.0	85.3	82.8	-2.5	87.2	89.0	81	103	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.0	86.0	86.4	0.4	87.2	93.0	89	68	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		76.0	83.3	81.4	-1.9	86.0	88.0	80	59	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		81.6	87.1	86.9	-0.2	89.3	90.8	27	84	25	No Change
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.7	90.6	87.1	-3.5	94.0	94.9	44	64	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.8	84.7	88.3	3.6	92.9	93.9	63	166	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		83.1	82.5	85.7	3.2	90.1	91.6	88	103	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.6	86.6	87.9	1.3	87.7	93.3	92	68	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		84.2	85.8	90.3	4.5	90.8	92.1	90	59	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		89.0	87.1	92.6	5.5	93.6	94.5	34	84	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.6	83.4	84.0	0.6	92.2	93.3	28	64	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.1	87.8	83.5	-4.3	89.6	91.1	59	65	0	Declined
High needs		78.0	84.7	79.6	-5.1	87.2	89.0	86	38	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		87.5	-	86.3	13.0	92.7	93.8	9	31	50	Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.9	91.3	81.3	-10.0	92.4	93.5	32	24	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.7	13.9	166	0	4.9	6.6	166	0
High needs	22.0	10.7	103	0	8.0	10.7	103	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	27.4	14.7	68	0	8.2	11.8	68	0
EL and Former EL	11.8	6.8	59	0	9.8	11.9	59	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	18.6	10.7	84	0	7.1	7.1	84	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	27.3	12.5	64	0	2.6	6.3	64	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	37.0	35.5	166	0	7.4	5.4	166	25
High needs	40.0	33.0	103	0	11.0	8.7	103	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	46.6	36.8	68	0	6.8	5.9	68	25
EL and Former EL	31.4	35.6	59	25	3.9	3.4	59	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	40.0	44.0	84	25	4.3	1.2	84	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	36.4	23.4	64	0	9.1	9.4	64	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.4	15.4	65	0	4.1	6.2	65	0
High needs	25.8	13.2	38	0	6.5	10.5	38	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	30.0	9.7	31	0	10.0	3.2	31	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.4	16.7	24	0	3.8	8.3	24	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.0	61.0	-4.0	51.0	No	109	100	Above Target
High needs		65.0	62.0	-3.0	51.0	No	65	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.0	66.0	1.0	51.0	No	47	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		67.0	72.0	5.0	51.0	No	32	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		69.0	64.5	-4.5	51.0	No	48	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		60.5	59.0	-1.5	51.0	No	45	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	62.0	24.0	51.0	Yes	109	100	Above Target
High needs		43.0	63.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	65	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.0	63.0	12.0	51.0	No	47	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		39.5	82.5	43.0	51.0	Yes	32	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		41.0	64.0	23.0	51.0	Yes	48	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		36.5	54.0	17.5	51.0	No	45	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	77.0	60.0	75.00	25
High needs	77.0	60.0	75.00	25
EL and Former EL	77.0	60.0	75.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	175	175	100	Yes	175	175	100	Yes	67	67	100	Yes
High needs	112	112	100	Yes	112	112	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	74	74	100	Yes	74	74	100	Yes	25	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	67	67	100	Yes	67	67	100	Yes	22	22	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	92	92	100	Yes	92	92	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	65	65	100	Yes	65	65	100	Yes	24	24	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.