Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Squantum
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Squantum
Organization Information
District:Quincy (02430000)School type:Elementary School
School:Squantum (02430095)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.6, Target = 91.7CPI = 88.6, Target = 91.7CPI = 88.6, Target = 91.7 85.8 90.9 88.6 -2.3 91.7 92.9 6515325No Change
High needsCPI = 82.8, Target = 86.2CPI = 82.8, Target = 86.2CPI = 82.8, Target = 86.2 76.3 86.5 82.8 -3.7 86.2 88.2 81610Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.8, Target = 93.6CPI = 84.8, Target = 93.6CPI = 84.8, Target = 93.6 93.0 93.0 84.8 -8.2 93.6 96.5 86330Declined
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.8, Target = 84.9CPI = 70.8, Target = 84.9CPI = 70.8, Target = 84.9 74.1 80.6 70.8 -9.8 84.9 87.1 67240Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 87.1, Target = 86.7CPI = 87.1, Target = 86.7 77.2 92.0 87.1 -4.9 86.7 88.6 283175On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.8, Target = 93.1CPI = 87.8, Target = 93.1CPI = 87.8, Target = 93.1 88.1 90.8 87.8 -3.0 93.1 94.1 48980Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.3, Target = 89.7CPI = 86.3, Target = 89.7CPI = 86.3, Target = 89.7 82.3 83.8 86.3 2.5 89.7 91.2 5315350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 82.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 82.4, Target = 85.4 75.0 81.0 82.4 1.4 85.4 87.5 776150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.8, Target = 82.9CPI = 84.8, Target = 82.9CPI = 84.8, Target = 82.9 81.3 81.3 84.8 3.5 82.9 90.7 8433100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74, Target = 81.6CPI = 74, Target = 81.6CPI = 74, Target = 81.6 68.5 69.2 74.0 4.8 81.6 84.3 752450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 90.3, Target = 89.3CPI = 90.3, Target = 89.3 81.6 92.9 90.3 -2.6 89.3 90.8 263175On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86, Target = 89.4CPI = 86, Target = 89.4CPI = 86, Target = 89.4 81.8 82.8 86.0 3.2 89.4 90.9 399850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.1, Target = 84.4CPI = 86.1, Target = 84.4CPI = 86.1, Target = 84.4 73.3 75.4 86.1 10.7 84.4 86.7 6845100Above Target
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.5, Target = 86.4CPI = 87.5, Target = 86.4CPI = 87.5, Target = 86.4 76.6 73.0 87.5 14.5 86.4 88.3 633075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.9 13.115325 2.4 3.31530
High needs 6.3 8.26125 3.2 6.6610
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.4 9.1330 0.0 6.1330
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 3.7 4.22425 7.4 16.7240
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 7.1 6.5310 0.0 6.5310
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.3 16.39825 3.3 3.1980
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.2 21.61530 6.7 2.015325
High needs 19.4 18.0610 12.9 3.36125
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.6 15.2330 12.5 0.03325
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 19.2 8.3240 23.1 8.32425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 32.1 35.53125 3.6 0.03125
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.8 18.4980 7.4 2.09825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.8 4.4450 12.9 0.04525
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.9 3.3300 15.7 0.03025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 44.0 58.0 14.0 51.0No9875On Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 50.0 42.0 -8.0 51.0No3550Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-16--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 39.5 54.0 14.5 51.0No70100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 59.0 55.5 -3.5 51.0No9875On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 67.0 51.0 -16.0 51.0No3575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-16--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 51.0 54.5 3.5 51.0No7075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 88.0 60.02325
High needs 88.0 60.02325
EL and Former EL- 60.023-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15915899Yes159159100Yes4646100Yes
High needs656498Yes6565100Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged3535100Yes3535100Yes9---
EL and Former EL25---25---5---
Students w/ disabilities2525100Yes2525100Yes6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian353497Yes3535100Yes8---
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---4---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White9999100Yes9999100Yes3030100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles