Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Merrymount
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Merrymount
Organization Information
District:Quincy (02430000)School type:Elementary School
School:Merrymount (02430060)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 93.4CPI = 91, Target = 93.4CPI = 91, Target = 93.4 88.6 91.7 91.0 -0.7 93.4 94.3 7417225No Change
High needsCPI = 84.7, Target = 86.5CPI = 84.7, Target = 86.5CPI = 84.7, Target = 86.5 76.9 83.9 84.7 0.8 86.5 88.5 869050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.5, Target = 88.8CPI = 87.5, Target = 88.8CPI = 87.5, Target = 88.8 87.8 87.8 87.5 -0.3 88.8 93.9 935075On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 79.8, Target = 80.4CPI = 79.8, Target = 80.4 73.9 92.3 79.8 -12.5 80.4 87.0 783175On Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.3, Target = 72.6CPI = 76.3, Target = 72.6CPI = 76.3, Target = 72.6 53.0 71.7 76.3 4.6 72.6 76.5 8138100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 85.8, Target = 93.9CPI = 85.8, Target = 93.9CPI = 85.8, Target = 93.9 90.9 94.2 85.8 -8.4 93.9 95.5 23300Declined
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.4, Target = 94.2CPI = 93.4, Target = 94.2 90.0 92.8 93.4 0.6 94.2 95.0 8112175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 92.6CPI = 91.7, Target = 92.6 87.3 91.5 91.7 0.2 92.6 93.7 7817275On Target
High needsCPI = 86.1, Target = 86.5CPI = 86.1, Target = 86.5 76.9 85.6 86.1 0.5 86.5 88.5 899075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87, Target = 89.4CPI = 87, Target = 89.4CPI = 87, Target = 89.4 88.4 88.4 87.0 -1.4 89.4 94.2 895025No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 86.3, Target = 92.7CPI = 86.3, Target = 92.7CPI = 86.3, Target = 92.7 90.2 91.3 86.3 -5.0 92.7 95.1 82310Declined
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.9, Target = 76.7CPI = 78.9, Target = 76.7CPI = 78.9, Target = 76.7 60.0 77.5 78.9 1.4 76.7 80.0 8638100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 92.5, Target = 93.5CPI = 92.5, Target = 93.5 90.2 93.3 92.5 -0.8 93.5 95.1 333075On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.6, Target = 93.5CPI = 93.6, Target = 93.5 88.8 92.4 93.6 1.2 93.5 94.4 8212175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.9, Target = 92.1CPI = 90.9, Target = 92.1CPI = 90.9, Target = 92.1 86.4 94.4 90.9 -3.5 92.1 93.2 865275On Target
High needs  77.1---- 88.6-26--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 94.2CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.2CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.2 90.0 94.5 93.1 -1.4 94.2 95.0 8936100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.8 14.51720 2.8 1.717225
High needs 11.0 3.3900 6.8 3.39025
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.2 2.0500 4.9 2.05025
EL and Former EL 15.4 3.2310 3.8 9.7310
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 2.6380 13.3 2.63825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 36.7 23.3300 3.3 6.7300
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.3 14.01210 2.3 0.012125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 47.2 42.41720 1.7 0.617225
High needs 31.5 26.7900 4.1 1.19025
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.1 30.0500 4.9 0.05025
EL and Former EL 46.2 29.0310 0.0 3.2310
Students w/ disabilities 13.3 13.2380 10.0 2.63825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 66.7 60.0300 0.0 3.3300
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 44.7 41.31210 1.5 0.012125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.3 36.5520 0.0 0.05225
High needs--26---26-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.0 30.6360 0.0 0.03625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 66.0 49.5 -16.5 51.0No11050Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 67.0 44.0 -23.0 51.0No5450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-13--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 64.0 50.0 -14.0 51.0No8150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 65.0 65.0 0.0 51.0No110100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 52.0 61.0 9.0 51.0No54100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-13--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 59.0 63.0 4.0 51.0No81100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 61.0 60.03525
High needs 61.0 60.03525
EL and Former EL 61.0 60.03525
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18318299Yes18318299Yes5555100Yes
High needs979699Yes979699Yes2727100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged555498Yes555498Yes16---
EL and Former EL3636100Yes3636100Yes3---
Students w/ disabilities393897Yes393897Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3535100Yes3535100Yes8---
Afr. Amer./Black12---12---4---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12512499Yes12512499Yes3737100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles