Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Atherton Hough
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Atherton Hough
Organization Information
District:Quincy (02430000)School type:Elementary School
School:Atherton Hough (02430040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.9, Target = 76.9CPI = 81.9, Target = 76.9CPI = 81.9, Target = 76.9 74.8 74.8 81.9 7.1 76.9 87.4 33141100Above Target
High needsCPI = 67.1, Target = 61.6CPI = 67.1, Target = 61.6CPI = 67.1, Target = 61.6 58.1 58.1 67.1 9.0 61.6 79.1 1573100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70, Target = 68.4CPI = 70, Target = 68.4CPI = 70, Target = 68.4 65.5 65.5 70.0 4.5 68.4 82.8 2240100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.6, Target = 44.8CPI = 54.6, Target = 44.8CPI = 54.6, Target = 44.8 39.8 39.8 54.6 14.8 44.8 69.9 2449100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86, Target = 80.7CPI = 86, Target = 80.7CPI = 86, Target = 80.7 78.9 78.9 86.0 7.1 80.7 89.5 38111100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.8, Target = 80.2CPI = 77.8, Target = 80.2CPI = 77.8, Target = 80.2 78.4 78.4 77.8 -0.6 80.2 89.2 2114125No Change
High needsCPI = 65.8, Target = 68.1CPI = 65.8, Target = 68.1CPI = 65.8, Target = 68.1 65.2 65.2 65.8 0.6 68.1 82.6 147350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.8, Target = 75.3CPI = 68.8, Target = 75.3CPI = 68.8, Target = 75.3 73.0 73.0 68.8 -4.2 75.3 86.5 21400Declined
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 55.1, Target = 54.2CPI = 55.1, Target = 54.2 50.0 50.0 55.1 5.1 54.2 75.0 234975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.1, Target = 83.8CPI = 81.1, Target = 83.8CPI = 81.1, Target = 83.8 82.3 82.3 81.1 -1.2 83.8 91.2 1811125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75, Target = 78.3CPI = 75, Target = 78.3CPI = 75, Target = 78.3 76.3 76.3 75.0 -1.3 78.3 88.2 346025No Change
High needs  66.3---- 83.2-29--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.7, Target = 79.3CPI = 77.7, Target = 79.3CPI = 77.7, Target = 79.3 77.4 77.4 77.7 0.3 79.3 88.7 234750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.9 19.914125 17.1 11.314125
High needs 2.9 11.07325 35.3 21.97325
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 15.04025 27.0 22.54025
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.04925 54.5 32.74925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.4 23.411125 11.0 7.211125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.1 22.014125 12.8 16.31410
High needs 8.7 17.87325 26.1 28.8730
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.5 20.04025 18.4 22.5400
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 4.4 8.24925 40.0 42.9490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.0 22.511125 10.0 14.41110
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.9 11.7600 2.6 15.0600
High needs--29---29-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.1 10.6470 0.0 12.8470
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 54.0 72.0 18.0 51.0Yes107100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 45.0 64.0 19.0 51.0Yes54100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-32--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 44.5 58.0 13.5 51.0Yes3775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 80, Target = 51SGP = 80, Target = 51SGP = 80, Target = 51 52.0 80.0 28.0 51.0Yes84100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 54.5 54.0 -0.5 51.0No10775On Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 50.0 52.0 2.0 51.0No5475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-32--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 42.0 49.0 7.0 51.0Yes3775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51 57.0 52.5 -4.5 51.0No8475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students144144100Yes144144100Yes6060100Yes
High needs7676100Yes7676100Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4141100Yes4141100Yes15---
EL and Former EL14---14---6---
Students w/ disabilities5252100Yes5252100Yes20---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian9---9---5---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino10---10---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White113113100Yes113113100Yes4747100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles