Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Manomet Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Manomet Elementary
Organization Information
District:Plymouth (02390000)School type:Elementary School
School:Manomet Elementary (02390015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.1, Target = 93.1CPI = 89.1, Target = 93.1CPI = 89.1, Target = 93.1 88.1 84.3 89.1 4.8 93.1 94.1 6616750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.1, Target = 87.8CPI = 82.1, Target = 87.8CPI = 82.1, Target = 87.8 79.1 69.2 82.1 12.9 87.8 89.6 796750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.8, Target = 74.8CPI = 87.8, Target = 74.8CPI = 87.8, Target = 74.8 72.5 72.5 87.8 15.3 74.8 86.3 9343100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.1, Target = 80.4CPI = 71.1, Target = 80.4CPI = 71.1, Target = 80.4 66.4 55.8 71.1 15.3 80.4 83.2 683250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89, Target = 92.9CPI = 89, Target = 92.9CPI = 89, Target = 92.9 87.8 83.8 89.0 5.2 92.9 93.9 5515550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 93.8CPI = 90.5, Target = 93.8CPI = 90.5, Target = 93.8 89.4 88.6 90.5 1.9 93.8 94.7 7316850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 83.2, Target = 91.1CPI = 83.2, Target = 91.1CPI = 83.2, Target = 91.1 84.7 74.6 83.2 8.6 91.1 92.4 816750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89, Target = 80.7CPI = 89, Target = 80.7CPI = 89, Target = 80.7 78.9 78.9 89.0 10.1 80.7 89.5 9443100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.3, Target = 87.2CPI = 70.3, Target = 87.2CPI = 70.3, Target = 87.2 78.1 62.5 70.3 7.8 87.2 89.1 663250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.9, Target = 93.9CPI = 89.9, Target = 93.9CPI = 89.9, Target = 93.9 89.5 88.0 89.9 1.9 93.9 94.8 6215650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 88.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 88.6, Target = 95.2 91.7 92.4 88.6 -3.8 95.2 95.9 78570Declined
High needs  85.2---- 92.6-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.5, Target = 95CPI = 88.5, Target = 95CPI = 88.5, Target = 95 91.5 92.4 88.5 -3.9 95.0 95.8 67520Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.1 23.416725 7.8 5.416725
High needs 5.0 13.46725 21.7 11.96725
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.5 14.04325 17.5 7.04325
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 9.43225 36.7 18.83225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 22.615525 7.8 5.215525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.7 39.316825 6.2 3.616825
High needs 19.0 23.96725 17.2 7.56725
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.7 27.94325 10.5 2.34325
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 6.7 12.53225 33.3 15.63225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.6 37.815625 6.6 3.815625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.6 35.1570 0.0 1.8570
High needs--24---24-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.6 34.6520 0.0 1.9520
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 54.0 61.0 7.0 51.0Yes117100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 40.0 56.0 16.0 51.0Yes46100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-27--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 56.0 65.0 9.0 51.0Yes108100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 38.5 38.0 -0.5 51.0No11725Below Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 29.0 36.0 7.0 51.0Yes4675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-27--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 38.0 38.0 0.0 51.0No10825Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students17317199Yes17317299Yes5858100Yes
High needs717099Yes717099Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged474698Yes474698Yes12---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities3434100Yes3434100Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---3---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino2---2-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White15915899Yes159159100Yes5353100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles