Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hedge
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hedge
Organization Information
District:Plymouth (02390000)School type:Elementary School
School:Hedge (02390010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75, Target = 90.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 75, Target = 90.3 75 or Higher All Students 83.4 76.3 75.0 -1.3 90.3 91.7 1612525No Change
High needsCPI = 66.1, Target = 87.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 66.1, Target = 87.7 75 or Higher High needs 78.9 69.2 66.1 -3.1 87.7 89.5 13700Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.5, Target = 73.1 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 67.5, Target = 73.1 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 70.7 70.7 67.5 -3.2 73.1 85.4 15570Declined
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities  64.8---- 82.4-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.5, Target = 92.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 76.5, Target = 92.6 75 or Higher White 87.3 80.1 76.5 -3.6 92.6 93.7 81010Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.6, Target = 88.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 76.6, Target = 88.7 75 or Higher All Students 80.7 76.3 76.6 0.3 88.7 90.4 1912450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.8, Target = 85.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 67.8, Target = 85.4 75 or Higher High needs 75.0 67.9 67.8 -0.1 85.4 87.5 206925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.6, Target = 72.2 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 69.6, Target = 72.2 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 69.7 69.7 69.6 -0.1 72.2 84.9 245625No Change
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities  62.5---- 81.3-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79.3, Target = 91.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 79.3, Target = 91.5 75 or Higher White 85.5 79.7 79.3 -0.4 91.5 92.8 1410025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 48.9, Target = 83.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 48.9, Target = 83.3 75 or Higher All Students 71.3 68.2 48.9 -19.3 83.3 85.7 5220Declined
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------16--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.5 9.612525 11.8 20.81250
High needs 5.8 7.17025 17.3 30.0700
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.5 7.0570 13.0 28.1570
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--26---26-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.5 9.91010 8.1 19.81010
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.0 19.412425 17.0 15.312425
High needs 7.5 13.06925 26.4 21.76925
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.5 14.35625 25.5 19.65625
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--25---25-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.7 20.01000 13.3 13.01000
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.5 0.0220 13.6 36.4220
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--16---16-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 50.0 52.5 2.5 51.0No6875On Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 51.5 48.0 -3.5 51.0No3950Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-31--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher White 49.0 54.0 5.0 51.0No5375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 37.0 48.0 11.0 51.0No7175On Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 36.0 37.0 1.0 51.0No4250Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-34--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 41.0 48.0 7.0 51.0No5550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012.00-
High needs- 60.012.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.012.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students131131100Yes13213199Yes2727100Yes
High needs7575100Yes767599Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged6262100Yes626198Yes14---
EL and Former EL9---10---1---
Students w/ disabilities2929100Yes292897Yes7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---1---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino7---8---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White105105100Yes10510499Yes19---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles