Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hobomock Elementary

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hobomock Elementary

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.5, Target = 94.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.5, Target = 94.9 75 or Higher All Students 91.3 92.7 93.5 0.8 94.9 95.7 8826875On Target
High needsCPI = 83.6, Target = 87.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 83.6, Target = 87.2 75 or Higher High needs 78.1 82.7 83.6 0.9 87.2 89.1 835550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.7, Target = 82.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 75.7, Target = 82.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 69.9 73.5 75.7 2.2 82.4 85.0 803550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.6, Target = 95 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.6, Target = 95 75 or Higher White 91.4 92.7 93.6 0.9 95.0 95.7 8226475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.1, Target = 93.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 92.1, Target = 93.6 75 or Higher All Students 89.1 89.9 92.1 2.2 93.6 94.6 8026675On Target
High needsCPI = 77.7, Target = 82.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 77.7, Target = 82.6 75 or Higher High needs 70.2 75.4 77.7 2.3 82.6 85.1 585550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.4, Target = 76.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 71.4, Target = 76.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 59.6 69.1 71.4 2.3 76.4 79.8 693550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 93.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 92.4, Target = 93.8 75 or Higher White 89.3 89.8 92.4 2.6 93.8 94.7 7726275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.2, Target = 94.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.2, Target = 94.2 75 or Higher All Students 90.0 87.1 83.2 -3.9 94.2 95.0 58760Declined
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83, Target = 94.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83, Target = 94.5 75 or Higher White 90.5 87.9 83.0 -4.9 94.5 95.3 39750Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.7 20.92680 3.1 1.126825
High needs 9.1 3.6550 10.9 5.55525
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 2.9350 17.6 8.63525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.5 20.52640 3.2 1.126425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 38.4 42.12660 2.7 3.82660
High needs 8.9 10.95525 12.5 12.7550
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 2.9350 20.6 17.13525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.3 42.02620 2.8 3.42620
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 22.1 17.1760 5.9 3.97625
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.2 17.3750 4.5 4.07525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 67.5 48.0 -19.5 51.0No19050Below Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 58.0 38.0 -20.0 51.0No3225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-0--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 67.0 48.0 -19.0 51.0No18850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 62.0 64.0 2.0 51.0Yes189100Above Target
High needsSGP = 73, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 49.0 73.0 24.0 51.0Yes33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher White 61.0 64.0 3.0 51.0Yes187100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03.00-
High needs- 60.03.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.03.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students27427199Yes27426998Yes7777100Yes
High needs585798Yes585798Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged25---25---5---
EL and Former EL2---2---1---
Students w/ disabilities373697Yes373697Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino1---1-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White27026799Yes27026598Yes7676100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles