Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bryantville Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bryantville Elementary
Organization Information
District:Pembroke (02310000)School type:Elementary School
School:Bryantville Elementary (02310003)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.1, Target = 92.4CPI = 86.1, Target = 92.4CPI = 86.1, Target = 92.4 87.0 85.3 86.1 0.8 92.4 93.5 5231950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.5, Target = 84.5CPI = 75.5, Target = 84.5CPI = 75.5, Target = 84.5 73.4 71.6 75.5 3.9 84.5 86.7 4810150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.6, Target = 81.6CPI = 82.6, Target = 81.6 79.9 79.9 82.6 2.7 81.6 90.0 786675On Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.1, Target = 79.4CPI = 59.1, Target = 79.4CPI = 59.1, Target = 79.4 64.6 52.2 59.1 6.9 79.4 82.3 334450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 86, Target = 92.5CPI = 86, Target = 92.5CPI = 86, Target = 92.5 87.2 85.3 86.0 0.7 92.5 93.6 3831050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.3, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.3, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.3, Target = 91.8 86.0 81.7 86.3 4.6 91.8 93.0 5332050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.8, Target = 84.2CPI = 74.8, Target = 84.2CPI = 74.8, Target = 84.2 72.9 65.8 74.8 9.0 84.2 86.5 4510150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.7, Target = 74.1CPI = 81.7, Target = 74.1CPI = 81.7, Target = 74.1 71.7 71.7 81.7 10.0 74.1 85.9 7367100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.5, Target = 76.1CPI = 58.5, Target = 76.1CPI = 58.5, Target = 76.1 59.1 50.0 58.5 8.5 76.1 79.6 324450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 86.3, Target = 92CPI = 86.3, Target = 92CPI = 86.3, Target = 92 86.3 82.0 86.3 4.3 92.0 93.2 4031150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.9, Target = 90CPI = 72.9, Target = 90CPI = 72.9, Target = 90 82.8 69.9 72.9 3.0 90.0 91.4 288450Improved Below Target
High needs  69.0---- 84.5-30--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 73.2, Target = 90.3CPI = 73.2, Target = 90.3CPI = 73.2, Target = 90.3 83.3 70.1 73.2 3.1 90.3 91.7 148250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.1 15.431925 5.2 7.83190
High needs 2.1 10.910125 12.6 17.81010
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.3 16.76625 8.2 12.1660
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0440 24.4 34.1440
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 10.4 15.831025 5.4 7.73100
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.5 35.932025 9.3 8.43200
High needs 7.4 19.810125 21.1 15.810125
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.8 26.96725 14.8 9.06725
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 2.2 2.3440 37.8 29.54425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 24.6 36.331125 9.3 8.43110
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.6 6.08425 12.0 8.38425
High needs--30---30-
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 3.7 6.18225 12.2 8.58225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 47.5 45.0 -2.5 51.0Yes23675On Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 42.0 40.0 -2.0 51.0Yes7375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 41.0 43.0 2.0 51.0Yes4675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 36.0 52.0 16.0 51.0Yes31100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 47.0 45.0 -2.0 51.0Yes23075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 49.5 51.0 1.5 51.0Yes23375On Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 55.5 56.0 0.5 51.0Yes7375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 49.0 54.0 5.0 51.0Yes4775On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 55.5 50.0 -5.5 51.0Yes3175On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 50.0 51.0 1.0 51.0Yes22775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students33432798Yes33232698Yes898899Yes
High needs10910697Yes10810597Yes333297Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged727199Yes7171100Yes21---
EL and Former EL3---3-------
Students w/ disabilities484595Yes484595Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---2---
Hispanic/Latino------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White32531898Yes32331798Yes878699Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles