Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John E. McCarthy

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - John E. McCarthy

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.3, Target = 92.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.3, Target = 92.2 75 or Higher All Students 86.6 87.7 88.3 0.6 92.2 93.3 6310550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.7, Target = 86.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 82.7, Target = 86.3 75 or Higher High needs 76.5 79.2 82.7 3.5 86.3 88.3 804950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.5, Target = 80.8 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 84.5, Target = 80.8CPI = 84.5, Target = 80.875 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 79.0 79.0 84.5 5.5 80.8 89.5 8529--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities  67.9---- 84.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89, Target = 92 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89, Target = 92 75 or Higher White 86.3 87.1 89.0 1.9 92.0 93.2 558650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.2, Target = 91.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89.2, Target = 91.7 75 or Higher All Students 85.7 91.0 89.2 -1.8 91.7 92.9 6710625No Change
High needsCPI = 85.2, Target = 87.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 85.2, Target = 87.7 75 or Higher High needs 78.9 87.8 85.2 -2.6 87.7 89.5 87490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  82.3---- 91.2-29--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities  61.9---- 81.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.7, Target = 91.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.7, Target = 91.4 75 or Higher White 85.2 91.3 89.7 -1.6 91.4 92.6 618725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.3, Target = 89.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86.3, Target = 89.2 75 or Higher All Students 81.4 85.3 86.3 1.0 89.2 90.7 694050Improved Below Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.5, Target = 89.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.5, Target = 89.7 75 or Higher White 82.3 84.0 84.5 0.5 89.7 91.2 482950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.8 12.410525 2.0 1.91050
High needs 7.1 6.1490 4.8 4.14925
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.0 6.929- 4.0 0.029-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--26---26-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.2 10.58625 2.3 1.28625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 39.0 34.91060 2.0 2.81060
High needs 31.7 18.4490 2.4 6.1490
Econ. Disadvantaged--29---29-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--26---26-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 39.5 35.6870 1.2 2.3870
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.2 20.04025 0.0 0.04025
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.0 17.22925 0.0 0.02925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 54.0 58.0 4.0 51.0No7175On Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 54.0 59.0 5.0 51.0Yes2975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher White 48.0 59.0 11.0 51.0No5775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 53.5 39.0 -14.5 51.0No7225Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 32, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 53.0 32.0 -21.0 51.0No2925Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 53.0 34.0 -19.0 51.0No5825Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06.00-
High needs- 60.06.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.06.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students11111099Yes111111100Yes4040100Yes
High needs5353100Yes5353100Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged3131100Yes3131100Yes11---
EL and Former EL11---11---4---
Students w/ disabilities2626100Yes2626100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6---3---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---4---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White908999Yes9090100Yes2929100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles