Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Center
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Center
Organization Information
District:Peabody (02290000)School type:Elementary School
School:Center (02290015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.3, Target = 91.7CPI = 86.3, Target = 91.7CPI = 86.3, Target = 91.7 85.8 84.4 86.3 1.9 91.7 92.9 5318050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.2, Target = 83.5CPI = 79.2, Target = 83.5CPI = 79.2, Target = 83.5 71.7 75.9 79.2 3.3 83.5 85.9 678450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.7, Target = 76.6CPI = 81.7, Target = 76.6CPI = 81.7, Target = 76.6 74.5 74.5 81.7 7.2 76.6 87.3 7456100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 75.9, Target = 75CPI = 75.9, Target = 75 70.0 72.9 75.9 3.0 75.0 85.0 702775On Target
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.2, Target = 92.2CPI = 87.2, Target = 92.2CPI = 87.2, Target = 92.2 86.7 85.4 87.2 1.8 92.2 93.4 4514550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.9, Target = 88.7CPI = 78.9, Target = 88.7CPI = 78.9, Target = 88.7 80.6 76.3 78.9 2.6 88.7 90.3 2418050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.1, Target = 79.4CPI = 66.1, Target = 79.4CPI = 66.1, Target = 79.4 64.6 65.3 66.1 0.8 79.4 82.3 158450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.9, Target = 68.3CPI = 67.9, Target = 68.3 65.4 65.4 67.9 2.5 68.3 82.7 195675On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 58.3, Target = 75CPI = 58.3, Target = 75CPI = 58.3, Target = 75 70.0 63.2 58.3 -4.9 75.0 85.0 10270Declined
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.2, Target = 90CPI = 81.2, Target = 90CPI = 81.2, Target = 90 82.9 77.1 81.2 4.1 90.0 91.5 1814550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.8, Target = 85.7CPI = 77.8, Target = 85.7CPI = 77.8, Target = 85.7 75.4 76.8 77.8 1.0 85.7 87.7 405350Improved Below Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.8, Target = 85.8CPI = 77.8, Target = 85.8CPI = 77.8, Target = 85.8 75.6 77.8 77.8 0.0 85.8 87.8 234425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.2 10.61800 5.9 4.418025
High needs 3.5 2.4840 8.2 9.5840
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.9 1.8560 9.8 8.9560
EL and Former EL 2.8 0.0270 11.1 7.42725
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.6 11.01450 4.8 3.414525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.1 21.118025 16.6 11.718025
High needs 9.4 9.5840 28.2 21.48425
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.6 8.9560 30.8 19.65625
EL and Former EL 13.9 3.7270 27.8 29.6270
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.5 22.814525 15.8 10.314525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.6 11.35325 7.1 9.4530
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.3 13.64425 3.8 11.4440
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 49.5 54.0 4.5 51.0No10775On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 45.0 53.0 8.0 51.0Yes4675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 44.5 53.5 9.0 51.0Yes2675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 51.0 55.0 4.0 51.0No8975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 42.0 55.0 13.0 51.0No10775On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 36.5 47.0 10.5 51.0No4675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 34.5 42.0 7.5 51.0No2650Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 42.0 55.0 13.0 51.0Yes8975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 67.0 60.02725
High needs 67.0 60.02725
EL and Former EL 67.0 60.02725
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19018999Yes19018999Yes5858100Yes
High needs8989100Yes8989100Yes22---
Econ. Disadvantaged5858100Yes5858100Yes10---
EL and Former EL3131100Yes3131100Yes10---
Students w/ disabilities25---25---8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black17---17---5---
Hispanic/Latino10---10---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White15115099Yes15115099Yes4848100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles