Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Clara Barton
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Clara Barton
Organization Information
District:Oxford (02260000)School type:Elementary School
School:Clara Barton (02260005)Grades served:03,04
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.3, Target = 86.2CPI = 80.3, Target = 86.2CPI = 80.3, Target = 86.2 76.4 79.7 80.3 0.6 86.2 88.2 2830850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.2, Target = 81.6CPI = 70.2, Target = 81.6CPI = 70.2, Target = 81.6 68.5 70.7 70.2 -0.5 81.6 84.3 2613625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.4, Target = 74.5CPI = 76.4, Target = 74.5CPI = 76.4, Target = 74.5 72.2 72.2 76.4 4.2 74.5 86.1 48107100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 47.7, Target = 72.4CPI = 47.7, Target = 72.4CPI = 47.7, Target = 72.4 52.7 58.7 47.7 -11.0 72.4 76.4 10430Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 70.5, Target = 81.7CPI = 70.5, Target = 81.7CPI = 70.5, Target = 81.7 72.5 62.5 70.5 8.0 81.7 86.3 413950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.9, Target = 86.7CPI = 82.9, Target = 86.7CPI = 82.9, Target = 86.7 77.2 82.3 82.9 0.6 86.7 88.6 2224550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.1, Target = 86.9CPI = 79.1, Target = 86.9CPI = 79.1, Target = 86.9 77.6 77.3 79.1 1.8 86.9 88.8 2430850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 68.9, Target = 81.2CPI = 68.9, Target = 81.2CPI = 68.9, Target = 81.2 67.7 68.6 68.9 0.3 81.2 83.9 2313650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.3, Target = 72.9CPI = 74.3, Target = 72.9CPI = 74.3, Target = 72.9 70.4 70.4 74.3 3.9 72.9 85.2 42107100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 46.5, Target = 75CPI = 46.5, Target = 75CPI = 46.5, Target = 75 57.2 55.0 46.5 -8.5 75.0 78.6 10430Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 69.2, Target = 80CPI = 69.2, Target = 80CPI = 69.2, Target = 80 70.0 59.7 69.2 9.5 80.0 85.0 353950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.9, Target = 87.3CPI = 80.9, Target = 87.3CPI = 80.9, Target = 87.3 78.2 79.9 80.9 1.0 87.3 89.1 1724550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 6.7 6.53080 7.7 8.43080
High needs 2.2 2.913625 13.7 17.61360
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.8 3.710725 14.0 12.110725
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0430 20.4 39.5430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 2.63925 13.3 17.9390
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--18---18-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.9 7.32450 6.7 5.724525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.1 20.83080 13.7 12.73080
High needs 13.6 11.01360 21.4 24.31360
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.6 14.01070 18.5 18.71070
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0430 38.0 51.2430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 9.7 15.43925 29.0 23.13925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--18---18-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.1 22.42450 11.5 11.02450
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 48.0 49.0 1.0 51.0No15050Below Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 39.0 47.0 8.0 51.0No6750Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 38.0 52.0 14.0 51.0No5075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 38.0 37.0 -1.0 51.0No2125Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 50.0 49.0 -1.0 51.0No12850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 42.0 38.0 -4.0 51.0No15125Below Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 38.5 41.0 2.5 51.0No6850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 37.0 41.0 4.0 51.0No5150Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 39.0 36.5 -2.5 51.0No2225Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 43.5 40.0 -3.5 51.0No12825Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students318317100Yes318317100Yes----
High needs144144100Yes144144100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged114114100Yes114114100Yes----
EL and Former EL5---5-------
Students w/ disabilities4646100Yes4646100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino3939100Yes3939100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.18---18-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White254253100Yes254253100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles