Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John P Oldham
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - John P Oldham
Organization Information
District:Norwood (02200000)School type:Elementary School
School:John P Oldham (02200020)Grades served:01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92, Target = 90.7CPI = 92, Target = 90.7CPI = 92, Target = 90.7 84.0 92.3 92.0 -0.3 90.7 92.0 79122100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.3, Target = 85.2CPI = 86.3, Target = 85.2CPI = 86.3, Target = 85.2 74.6 84.5 86.3 1.8 85.2 87.3 915175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87, Target = 88.9CPI = 87, Target = 88.9CPI = 87, Target = 88.9 87.9 87.9 87.0 -0.9 88.9 94.0 922575On Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 88.3, Target = 82.8CPI = 88.3, Target = 82.8CPI = 88.3, Target = 82.8 70.5 88.4 88.3 -0.1 82.8 85.3 9832100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.3, Target = 91.1CPI = 94.3, Target = 91.1CPI = 94.3, Target = 91.1 84.7 93.1 94.3 1.2 91.1 92.4 8788100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.8, Target = 88.3CPI = 91.8, Target = 88.3CPI = 91.8, Target = 88.3 79.9 84.3 91.8 7.5 88.3 90.0 79122100Above Target
High needsCPI = 89.7, Target = 84.1CPI = 89.7, Target = 84.1CPI = 89.7, Target = 84.1 72.7 79.1 89.7 10.6 84.1 86.4 9551100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 91, Target = 78.6CPI = 91, Target = 78.6CPI = 91, Target = 78.6 76.6 76.6 91.0 14.4 78.6 88.3 9725100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 94.5, Target = 80.6CPI = 94.5, Target = 80.6CPI = 94.5, Target = 80.6 66.7 84.8 94.5 9.7 80.6 83.4 9932100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.9, Target = 89.8CPI = 94.9, Target = 89.8CPI = 94.9, Target = 89.8 82.5 85.4 94.9 9.5 89.8 91.3 9088100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.8, Target = 88.7CPI = 84.8, Target = 88.7CPI = 84.8, Target = 88.7 80.6 77.8 84.8 7.0 88.7 90.3 644650Improved Below Target
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.8, Target = 88.7CPI = 86.8, Target = 88.7CPI = 86.8, Target = 88.7 80.7 79.3 86.8 7.5 88.7 90.4 593450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.9 9.01220 2.4 0.812225
High needs 5.5 2.0510 5.5 2.05125
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.2 4.02525 3.2 0.02525
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 0.0320 3.6 0.03225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.1 11.4880 1.1 0.08825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.2 42.612225 5.6 2.512225
High needs 18.2 33.35125 9.1 5.95125
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.9 28.02525 12.9 4.02525
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 17.9 40.63225 7.1 3.13225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.6 44.38825 5.3 1.18825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.4 2.2460 8.9 2.24625
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.7 2.9340 8.6 2.93425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 50.0 43.0 -7.0 51.0No8250Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 47.5 39.0 -8.5 51.0No3325Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-12--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 49.0 42.5 -6.5 51.0No5850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 41.0 44.5 3.5 51.0Yes8275On Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 50.0 38.0 -12.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-12--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 38.0 42.5 4.5 51.0Yes5875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017-
High needs- 60.017-
EL and Former EL- 60.017-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students126126100Yes126126100Yes5050100Yes
High needs5353100Yes5353100Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged2626100Yes2626100Yes7---
EL and Former EL16---16---6---
Students w/ disabilities3232100Yes3232100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7-------
Afr. Amer./Black18---18---9---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8989100Yes8989100Yes3535100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles