Massachusetts School and District Profiles

William G Vinal

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - William G Vinal

Organization Information
District:Norwell (02190000)School type:Elementary School
School:William G Vinal (02190020)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.2, Target = 97.4CPI = 90.2, Target = 97.4CPI = 90.2, Target = 97.4 95.5 90.4 90.2 -0.2 97.4 97.8 7125525No Change
High needsCPI = 71.5, Target = 89.1CPI = 71.5, Target = 89.1CPI = 71.5, Target = 89.1 81.3 71.8 71.5 -0.3 89.1 90.7 294325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 69.2, Target = 88.2CPI = 69.2, Target = 88.2CPI = 69.2, Target = 88.2 79.7 67.2 69.2 2.0 88.2 89.9 633950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 90.1, Target = 97.6CPI = 90.1, Target = 97.6CPI = 90.1, Target = 97.6 95.8 90.0 90.1 0.1 97.6 97.9 6224450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.4, Target = 96.1CPI = 88.4, Target = 96.1CPI = 88.4, Target = 96.1 93.3 87.5 88.4 0.9 96.1 96.7 6425550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 68, Target = 82.1CPI = 68, Target = 82.1CPI = 68, Target = 82.1 69.3 65.0 68.0 3.0 82.1 84.7 214350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.7, Target = 80.7CPI = 64.7, Target = 80.7CPI = 64.7, Target = 80.7 66.9 60.9 64.7 3.8 80.7 83.5 513950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 88.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 88.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 88.2, Target = 96.3 93.6 86.7 88.2 1.5 96.3 96.8 5224450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.8, Target = 97CPI = 86.8, Target = 97CPI = 86.8, Target = 97 94.8 92.3 86.8 -5.5 97.0 97.4 711000Declined
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------3--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.5, Target = 96.9CPI = 86.5, Target = 96.9CPI = 86.5, Target = 96.9 94.7 91.8 86.5 -5.3 96.9 97.4 57980Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 16.1 16.52550 2.9 2.72550
High needs 3.7 2.3430 13.0 11.64325
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0390 15.6 12.83925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 15.5 16.42440 3.0 2.92440
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 29.3 31.82550 5.0 4.325525
High needs 7.3 2.3430 23.6 23.3430
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 4.3 2.6390 28.3 25.6390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 28.4 30.72440 5.3 4.524425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.7 21.01000 2.9 5.01000
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--3---3-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.7 21.4980 3.1 5.1980
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 54.0 56.5 2.5 51.0No17075On Target
High needsSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 49.0 64.5 15.5 51.0No28100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-3--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 45.0 64.0 19.0 51.0No25100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 54.0 54.0 0.0 51.0No16275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 64.0 40.5 -23.5 51.0No17050Below Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 54.0 50.0 -4.0 51.0Yes2975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-3--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 55.5 55.5 0.0 51.0No2675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 64.0 40.0 -24.0 51.0No16225Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students26125899Yes26125899Yes101101100Yes
High needs444398Yes444398Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged6---6---3---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities403998Yes403998Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino2---2-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White25024799Yes25024799Yes9999100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles