Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Norton Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Norton Middle

Organization Information

District:

Norton (02180000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Norton Middle (02180305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.0	93.8	95.0	1.2	97.1	97.5	81	601	75	On Target
High needs		87.8	83.9	87.1	3.2	92.9	93.9	87	163	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		89.7	89.7	91.1	1.4	90.6	94.9	86	90	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		81.4	77.1	80.4	3.3	89.2	90.7	82	98	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		95.1	94.1	95.0	0.9	97.1	97.6	73	556	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.1	84.4	83.8	-0.6	90.1	91.6	67	602	25	No Change
High needs		68.0	64.7	64.7	0.0	81.3	84.0	58	163	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.7	72.7	70.3	-2.4	75.0	86.4	59	90	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		60.7	54.6	53.1	-1.5	77.1	80.4	61	98	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		83.7	84.8	84.5	-0.3	90.5	91.9	61	556	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.8	80.2	77.2	-3.0	88.8	90.4	57	201	0	Declined
High needs		64.3	63.1	64.4	1.3	79.2	82.2	68	47	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.9	71.9	69.0	-2.9	74.2	86.0	75	29	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		53.7	55.0	51.9	-3.1	73.0	76.9	52	26	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		81.5	80.8	78.3	-2.5	89.2	90.8	50	188	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.0	20.0	601	0	2.4	1.2	601	25
High needs	5.7	3.7	163	0	8.6	4.3	163	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.2	3.3	90	0	4.1	2.2	90	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	3.1	98	25	13.0	7.1	98	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	20.0	20.1	556	0	2.3	1.1	556	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.8	26.4	602	0	9.9	8.8	602	25
High needs	7.4	10.4	163	25	29.7	27.0	163	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.2	10.0	90	25	18.6	21.1	90	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.4	7.1	98	25	40.4	41.8	98	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	25.2	27.7	556	0	9.0	8.1	556	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.4	2.5	201	0	9.1	8.5	201	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	47	0	25.4	23.4	47	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	29	0	18.8	17.2	29	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	26	0	32.5	42.3	26	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	2.1	2.7	188	25	8.9	7.4	188	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.0	56.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	588	75	On Target
High needs		55.5	56.0	0.5	51.0	Yes	156	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.0	51.5	-9.5	51.0	No	88	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.5	64.0	9.5	51.0	No	91	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		52.0	55.0	3.0	51.0	No	545	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	54.0	6.0	51.0	No	589	75	On Target
High needs		43.5	58.0	14.5	51.0	No	156	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	60.5	10.5	51.0	No	88	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.0	55.0	18.0	51.0	No	91	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		47.0	54.0	7.0	51.0	No	545	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	609	607	100	Yes	610	608	100	Yes	204	204	100	Yes
High needs	167	166	99	Yes	168	166	99	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	93	92	99	Yes	93	92	99	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	98	98	100	Yes	99	98	99	Yes	26	26	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	12	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	561	559	100	Yes	561	559	100	Yes	189	189	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.