Massachusetts School and District Profiles

E Ethel Little School
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - E Ethel Little School
Organization Information
District:North Reading (02170000)School type:Elementary School
School:E Ethel Little School (02170003)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.4, Target = 94.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94.4, Target = 94.875 or Higher All Students 91.0 94.3 94.4 0.1 94.8 95.5 91130100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.5, Target = 92 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 85.5, Target = 92 75 or Higher High needs 86.3 82.9 85.5 2.6 92.0 93.2 883850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 82.8, Target = 88.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 82.8, Target = 88.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 80.9 79.0 82.8 3.8 88.9 90.5 932975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.5, Target = 94.5 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 94.5, Target = 94.575 or Higher White 90.5 93.8 94.5 0.7 94.5 95.3 88118100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.2, Target = 95.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.2, Target = 95.9 75 or Higher All Students 93.0 92.5 91.2 -1.3 95.9 96.5 7713025No Change
High needsCPI = 82.2, Target = 93.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 82.2, Target = 93.1 75 or Higher High needs 88.2 80.5 82.2 1.7 93.1 94.1 763850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.4, Target = 91.8 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 78.4, Target = 91.8 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 86.0 77.4 78.4 1.0 91.8 93.0 852950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.7, Target = 95.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 90.7, Target = 95.9 75 or Higher White 93.0 92.1 90.7 -1.4 95.9 96.5 6611825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.3, Target = 96.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.3, Target = 96.4 75 or Higher All Students 93.9 88.7 91.3 2.6 96.4 97.0 884975On Target
High needs -------5--
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.8, Target = 96.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 90.8, Target = 96.3 75 or Higher White 93.6 87.8 90.8 3.0 96.3 96.8 804675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.5 23.11300 1.4 0.013025
High needs 4.9 0.0380 4.9 0.03825
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0290 6.5 0.02925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.1 22.01180 1.5 0.011825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.7 36.21300 2.8 2.313025
High needs 12.2 15.83825 9.8 7.93825
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 6.9290 12.9 10.32925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.1 34.71180 3.0 2.511825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.5 26.5490 5.7 2.04925
High needs--5---5-
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.5 26.1460 6.1 2.24625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 64.0 53.0 -11.0 51.0No9275On Target
High needs --- 51.0-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher White 63.5 54.0 -9.5 51.0No8475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 31.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 57.0 31.5 -25.5 51.0No9225Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 31, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 31, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 55.0 31.0 -24.0 51.0No8425Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01.00-
High needs- 60.01.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.01.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13513298Yes13513298Yes504998Yes
High needs393897Yes393897Yes6---
Econ. Disadvantaged14---14---1---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities2929100Yes2929100Yes5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---1---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino7---7---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12111898Yes12111898Yes474698Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles