Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Northbridge High
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Northbridge High
Organization Information
District:Northbridge (02140000)School type:High School
School:Northbridge High (02140505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.1, Target = 97.7 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 97.1, Target = 97.775 or Higher All Students 96.0 95.8 97.1 1.3 97.7 98.0 3514875On Target
High needsCPI = 91.1, Target = 93.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 91.1, Target = 93.9 75 or Higher High needs 89.5 88.4 91.1 2.7 93.9 94.8 244550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 97.1, Target = 93.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 97.1, Target = 93.1CPI = 97.1, Target = 93.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 92.5 92.5 97.1 4.6 93.1 96.3 6835100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.4, Target = 97.6 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 98.4, Target = 97.675 or Higher White 95.8 96.4 98.4 2.0 97.6 97.9 41123100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.7, Target = 93.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90.7, Target = 93.2 75 or Higher All Students 88.3 89.8 90.7 0.9 93.2 94.2 4014850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 81.1, Target = 84.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 81.1, Target = 84.6 75 or Higher High needs 73.6 81.3 81.1 -0.2 84.6 86.8 444525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.7, Target = 85.8 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 85.7, Target = 85.875 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 84.5 84.5 85.7 1.2 85.8 92.3 543575On Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.3, Target = 92.9 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 92.3, Target = 92.975 or Higher White 87.9 91.9 92.3 0.4 92.9 94.0 3712375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.1, Target = 93.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90.1, Target = 93.6 75 or Higher All Students 89.1 86.4 90.1 3.7 93.6 94.6 3814150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 85.4, Target = 86 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 85.4, Target = 8675 or Higher High needs 76.0 73.0 85.4 12.4 86.0 88.0 574175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.1, Target = 80.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 89.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 89.1, Target = 80.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 78.8 78.8 89.1 10.3 80.6 89.4 7232100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90, Target = 93.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 90, Target = 93.5 75 or Higher White 88.9 87.5 90.0 2.5 93.5 94.5 2211850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.4 39.91480 2.2 1.414825
High needs 26.8 31.14525 7.3 4.44525
Econ. Disadvantaged 33.3 37.13525 3.3 0.03525
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 40.3 39.81230 1.7 0.012325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.7 48.614825 3.7 2.014825
High needs 30.0 33.34525 12.5 4.44525
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.4 37.1350 13.8 2.93525
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.7 49.612325 2.6 0.812325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.7 14.21410 6.5 0.714125
High needs 10.8 9.8410 21.6 2.44125
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.4 12.5320 19.2 3.13225
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.8 14.41180 6.3 0.811825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 45.5 45.0 -0.5 51.0Yes14175On Target
High needsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 57.0 46.5 -10.5 51.0No4250Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 46.5, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 56.5 46.5 -10.0 51.0Yes3475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 42.0 45.5 3.5 51.0Yes11875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 49.0 56.0 7.0 51.0No14075On Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 60.0 54.0 -6.0 51.0No4175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 50.5, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 50.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 59.0 50.5 -8.5 51.0No3475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 49.0 56.5 7.5 51.0No11875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05.00-
High needs- 60.05.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.05.00-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 90.4, Target = 80 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.4, Target = 8075 or Higher All Students 90.4 90.4 0.0 80.0 90.018775On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 82.4, Target = 80 - High needsHigh needs-Cohort Graduation Rate = 82.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 82.4, Target = 8075 or Higher High needs 84.8 82.4 -2.4 80.0 90.08575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.035--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.07--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.05--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 80 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 8075 or Higher White 91.6 92.5 0.9 80.0 90.017475On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 85 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 8575 or Higher All Students 88.1 91.5 3.4 85.0 95.018875On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 85 - High needsHigh needs-Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 8575 or Higher High needs 81.3 86.1 4.8 85.0 95.07975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.027--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.02--
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 85 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 8575 or Higher White 89.0 92.1 3.1 85.0 95.017875On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.4, Target = 2.2Dropout Rate 75 or Higher All Students 3.7 1.2 1.4 -0.2 2.2 1.94265075On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 3.9, Target = 4.7Dropout Rate 75 or Higher High needs 8.1 2.4 3.9 -1.5 4.7 4.12718175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  3.8---- 1.9-104--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------92--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------46--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.2, Target = 2.2Dropout Rate 75 or Higher White 3.7 1.1 1.2 -0.1 2.2 1.93657375On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15515197Yes15515097Yes15515298Yes
High needs484696Yes484696Yes484696Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged383695Yes383695Yes383695Yes
EL and Former EL4---4---4---
Students w/ disabilities17---17---17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---2---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino18---18---18---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12812497Yes12812497Yes12812698Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles