Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Thomson

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Thomson

Organization Information
District:North Andover (02110000)School type:Elementary School
School:Thomson (02110020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 93.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.9, Target = 93.8 75 or Higher All Students 89.4 88.8 84.9 -3.9 93.8 94.7 471460Declined
High needsCPI = 69.9, Target = 87.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 69.9, Target = 87.9 75 or Higher High needs 79.3 79.8 69.9 -9.9 87.9 89.7 24490Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.7, Target = 85.5 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 77.7, Target = 85.5 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 84.2 84.2 77.7 -6.5 85.5 92.1 54280Declined
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.8, Target = 94.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 85.8, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher White 91.0 89.8 85.8 -4.0 94.8 95.5 371090Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.6, Target = 92.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.6, Target = 92.7 75 or Higher All Students 87.5 86.6 85.6 -1.0 92.7 93.8 5114625No Change
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 85.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75, Target = 85.1 75 or Higher High needs 74.5 78.4 75.0 -3.4 85.1 87.3 46490Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.6, Target = 76.4 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 78.6, Target = 76.4CPI = 78.6, Target = 76.475 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 74.2 74.2 78.6 4.4 76.4 87.1 6028100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.9, Target = 93.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.9, Target = 93.5 75 or Higher White 88.8 88.6 86.9 -1.7 93.5 94.4 4310925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.4, Target = 90.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 81.4, Target = 90.6 75 or Higher All Students 83.9 78.2 81.4 3.2 90.6 92.0 514750Improved Below Target
High needs -------13--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.1, Target = 91.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 80.1, Target = 91.3 75 or Higher White 85.0 82.6 80.1 -2.5 91.3 92.5 283425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.9 17.81460 0.7 6.81460
High needs 5.3 4.1490 1.8 16.3490
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 3.62825 0.0 7.1280
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.9 17.41090 1.0 4.61090
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.9 34.21460 5.5 6.81460
High needs 15.5 16.3490 10.3 14.3490
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.7 17.92825 16.1 10.72825
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.2 35.81090 3.8 7.31090
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 18.2 17.0470 9.1 4.34725
High needs--13---13-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.4 20.6340 5.6 2.93425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 50, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 53.0 50.0 -3.0 51.0No9750Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 32, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 60.5 32.0 -28.5 51.0No3025Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 58.5 48.0 -10.5 51.0No7150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 55.0 53.0 -2.0 51.0No9775On Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 58.0 37.5 -20.5 51.0No3025Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher White 52.0 53.0 1.0 51.0No7175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014.00-
High needs- 60.014.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.014.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15715699Yes15715699Yes504998Yes
High needs585798Yes585798Yes15---
Econ. Disadvantaged3535100Yes3535100Yes9---
EL and Former EL13---13---4---
Students w/ disabilities27---27---9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---5---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino21---21---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White115115100Yes115115100Yes363597Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles