Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Colegrove Park Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - J S Sullivan
Organization Information
District:North Adams (02090000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:J S Sullivan (02090008)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.5, Target = 89.7CPI = 76.5, Target = 89.7CPI = 76.5, Target = 89.7 82.3 76.3 76.5 0.2 89.7 91.2 2818450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.7, Target = 86.9CPI = 71.7, Target = 86.9CPI = 71.7, Target = 86.9 77.6 71.8 71.7 -0.1 86.9 88.8 3412725No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.8, Target = 73.4CPI = 71.8, Target = 73.4CPI = 71.8, Target = 73.4 71.0 71.0 71.8 0.8 73.4 85.5 3110950Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.7, Target = 78CPI = 62.7, Target = 78CPI = 62.7, Target = 78 62.2 66.3 62.7 -3.6 78.0 81.1 55590Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 76.3, Target = 90.7CPI = 76.3, Target = 90.7CPI = 76.3, Target = 90.7 84.0 76.4 76.3 -0.1 90.7 92.0 917125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 71.1, Target = 85.6CPI = 71.1, Target = 85.6CPI = 71.1, Target = 85.6 75.3 72.6 71.1 -1.5 85.6 87.7 3818125No Change
High needsCPI = 68.1, Target = 82.5CPI = 68.1, Target = 82.5CPI = 68.1, Target = 82.5 70.0 68.9 68.1 -0.8 82.5 85.0 5012625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.1, Target = 72.9CPI = 70.1, Target = 72.9CPI = 70.1, Target = 72.9 70.4 70.4 70.1 -0.3 72.9 85.2 5810725No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.6, Target = 74.3CPI = 60.6, Target = 74.3CPI = 60.6, Target = 74.3 55.9 57.4 60.6 3.2 74.3 78.0 715950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 72.6, Target = 86.6CPI = 72.6, Target = 86.6CPI = 72.6, Target = 86.6 77.1 74.4 72.6 -1.8 86.6 88.6 1516825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 65, Target = 77.1CPI = 65, Target = 77.1CPI = 65, Target = 77.1 60.8 70.0 65.0 -5.0 77.1 80.4 47350Declined
High needs  61.4---- 80.7-27--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 66.7, Target = 78.1CPI = 66.7, Target = 78.1CPI = 66.7, Target = 78.1 62.5 70.4 66.7 -3.7 78.1 81.3 14300Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.3 2.718425 12.0 12.01840
High needs 0.0 2.412725 15.5 15.01270
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.810925 13.6 15.61090
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0590 23.1 23.7590
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 1.4 2.917125 13.0 12.91710
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.7 9.91810 19.9 21.01810
High needs 10.5 9.51260 25.4 23.81260
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.6 11.21070 23.0 20.610725
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 3.9 1.7590 43.1 32.25925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 16.2 10.71680 18.4 19.01680
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 6.7 0.0350 3.3 20.0350
High needs--27---27-
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 3.7 0.0300 3.7 20.0300
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 45.0 50.5 5.5 51.0No12475On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 44.0 44.0 0.0 51.0No8350Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 44.0 43.0 -1.0 51.0No7150Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 44.0 38.5 -5.5 51.0No3225Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 45.0 51.0 6.0 51.0No11275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 41.0 31.0 -10.0 51.0No12425Below Target
High needsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 40.0 31.0 -9.0 51.0No8325Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 51.0 31.5 -19.5 51.0No7025Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 40.0 35.0 -5.0 51.0No3225Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 30.5, Target = 51SGP = 30.5, Target = 51SGP = 30.5, Target = 51 41.0 30.5 -10.5 51.0No11225Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students20520399Yes20319998Yes3838100Yes
High needs14514499Yes14314299Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged124124100Yes12212199Yes25---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities686799Yes686799Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---4---
Hispanic/Latino------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White18918799Yes18718398Yes3333100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles