Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Peirce

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Peirce

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.3, Target = 97.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 95.3, Target = 97.4 75 or Higher All Students 95.6 91.7 95.3 3.6 97.4 97.8 95170100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.5, Target = 90.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 85.5, Target = 90.5 75 or Higher High needs 83.7 75.7 85.5 9.8 90.5 91.9 883850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85.7, Target = 90.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 85.7, Target = 90.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 83.6 74.1 85.7 11.6 90.4 91.8 962875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------23--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.3, Target = 97.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 96.3, Target = 97.8 75 or Higher White 96.3 94.6 96.3 1.7 97.8 98.2 96116100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.7, Target = 96 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.7, Target = 96 75 or Higher All Students 93.1 92.7 93.7 1.0 96.0 96.6 8817075On Target
High needsCPI = 80.3, Target = 87.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 80.3, Target = 87.1 75 or Higher High needs 77.9 77.1 80.3 3.2 87.1 89.0 693850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.8, Target = 86.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 76.8, Target = 86.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 76.3 74.1 76.8 2.7 86.2 88.2 812850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------23--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.3, Target = 95.4 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.3, Target = 95.475 or Higher White 92.1 94.3 95.3 1.0 95.4 96.1 92116100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.9, Target = 94.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.9, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher All Students 91.0 89.6 88.9 -0.7 94.8 95.5 795425No Change
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------3--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.2, Target = 95 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96.2, Target = 95CPI = 96.2, Target = 9575 or Higher White 91.4 87.9 96.2 8.3 95.0 95.7 9733100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.8 35.917025 3.8 1.217025
High needs 0.0 2.63825 16.7 5.33825
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0280 20.7 7.12825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--23---23-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.6 39.711625 1.9 0.011625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 44.4 55.917025 3.1 1.217025
High needs 11.1 7.9380 11.1 5.33825
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 6.9 7.1280 13.8 7.12825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--23---23-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 45.3 62.111625 2.8 0.911625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 36.6 40.75425 4.9 7.4540
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--3---3-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.4 48.53325 6.9 0.03325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 77, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 61.5 77.0 15.5 51.0Yes113100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-26--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-7--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 75, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 5175 or Higher White 66.0 75.0 9.0 51.0Yes74100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 73, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 69.0 73.0 4.0 51.0No113100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-26--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-7--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 75.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 75.5, Target = 51SGP = 75.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 72.5 75.5 3.0 51.0No74100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05.00-
High needs- 60.05.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.05.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students173173100Yes173173100Yes5656100Yes
High needs4141100Yes4141100Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged9---9---3---
EL and Former EL13---13---5---
Students w/ disabilities2828100Yes2828100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian26---26---9---
Afr. Amer./Black11---11---6---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White116116100Yes116116100Yes3333100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles