Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cabot

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Cabot

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96, Target = 95.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 96, Target = 95.875 or Higher All Students 92.8 94.2 96.0 1.8 95.8 96.4 98215100Above Target
High needsCPI = 90, Target = 91 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 90, Target = 9175 or Higher High needs 84.5 83.7 90.0 6.3 91.0 92.3 975575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 87.9, Target = 91 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 87.9, Target = 91 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 84.6 77.3 87.9 10.6 91.0 92.3 983375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------19--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.7, Target = 96 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96.7, Target = 9675 or Higher White 93.2 95.4 96.7 1.3 96.0 96.6 97157100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.9, Target = 95.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.9, Target = 95.5 75 or Higher All Students 92.3 93.2 93.9 0.7 95.5 96.2 8921675On Target
High needsCPI = 84.5, Target = 89.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 84.5, Target = 89.4 75 or Higher High needs 81.8 80.3 84.5 4.2 89.4 90.9 845550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 83.3, Target = 88.3 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 83.3, Target = 88.3 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 80.0 71.1 83.3 12.2 88.3 90.0 933375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------19--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.9, Target = 96.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.9, Target = 96.2 75 or Higher White 93.4 94.9 94.9 0.0 96.2 96.7 90158100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.8, Target = 94.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89.8, Target = 94.9 75 or Higher All Students 91.3 90.5 89.8 -0.7 94.9 95.7 837675On Target
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 95 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.1, Target = 95 75 or Higher White 91.4 92.5 93.1 0.6 95.0 95.7 8958100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 30.7 35.321525 1.9 0.921525
High needs 17.3 18.2550 7.7 3.65525
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 3.0330 12.5 3.03325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--19---19-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.0 38.915725 1.9 0.615725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 45.5 51.921625 2.3 1.921625
High needs 28.8 21.8550 9.6 5.55525
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 18.8 12.1330 12.5 3.03325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--19---19-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 45.2 55.115825 1.9 1.315825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.0 22.4760 0.0 3.9760
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.0 24.1580 0.0 0.05825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 61.0 62.5 1.5 51.0Yes134100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 36.0 58.0 22.0 51.0Yes27100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-11--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 64.0 59.5 -4.5 51.0Yes10275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 52.0 53.0 1.0 51.0No13375On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 52.0 55.0 3.0 51.0No2775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-11--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 52.0 48.0 -4.0 51.0No10250Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.019.00-
High needs- 60.019.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.019.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students221220100Yes221221100Yes7676100Yes
High needs5959100Yes5959100Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged25---25---8---
EL and Former EL18---18---4---
Students w/ disabilities3333100Yes3333100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian20---20---5---
Afr. Amer./Black11---11---3---
Hispanic/Latino19---19---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16216199Yes162162100Yes5858100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles