Massachusetts School and District Profiles

C C Burr

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - C C Burr

Organization Information
District:Newton (02070000)School type:Elementary School
School:C C Burr (02070020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.9, Target = 97.5CPI = 90.9, Target = 97.5CPI = 90.9, Target = 97.5 95.7 89.8 90.9 1.1 97.5 97.9 7419550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73, Target = 94.1CPI = 73, Target = 94.1CPI = 73, Target = 94.1 89.8 78.1 73.0 -5.1 94.1 94.9 37490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63.7, Target = 91.4CPI = 63.7, Target = 91.4CPI = 63.7, Target = 91.4 85.2 69.8 63.7 -6.1 91.4 92.6 47310Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 96.2, Target = 99.2CPI = 96.2, Target = 99.2CPI = 96.2, Target = 99.2 98.6 93.9 96.2 2.3 99.2 99.3 7133100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 97.9CPI = 92.7, Target = 97.9CPI = 92.7, Target = 97.9 96.4 91.5 92.7 1.2 97.9 98.2 7712675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.1, Target = 97.2CPI = 89.1, Target = 97.2CPI = 89.1, Target = 97.2 95.2 88.7 89.1 0.4 97.2 97.6 6619550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.9, Target = 92.1CPI = 71.9, Target = 92.1CPI = 71.9, Target = 92.1 86.4 80.8 71.9 -8.9 92.1 93.2 32490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.1, Target = 87.2CPI = 62.1, Target = 87.2CPI = 62.1, Target = 87.2 78.1 67.2 62.1 -5.1 87.2 89.1 42310Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 96.2, Target = 100CPI = 96.2, Target = 100CPI = 96.2, Target = 100 100.0 95.9 96.2 0.3 100.0 100.0 5033100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.7, Target = 97.7CPI = 91.7, Target = 97.7CPI = 91.7, Target = 97.7 96.0 90.5 91.7 1.2 97.7 98.0 7312650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.2, Target = 94.5CPI = 82.2, Target = 94.5CPI = 82.2, Target = 94.5 90.5 90.4 82.2 -8.2 94.5 95.3 54660Declined
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.8, Target = 96.7CPI = 85.8, Target = 96.7CPI = 85.8, Target = 96.7 94.3 90.4 85.8 -4.6 96.7 97.2 54440Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 21.1 33.319525 4.5 4.61950
High needs 12.5 10.2490 16.1 16.3490
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 0.0310 24.1 22.6310
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 27.0 39.43325 2.7 0.03325
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.6 32.512625 2.4 1.612625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 36.7 47.219525 4.5 7.21950
High needs 25.0 18.4490 14.3 22.4490
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 20.7 16.1310 24.1 32.3310
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 48.6 66.73325 0.0 0.03325
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.7 47.612625 1.6 5.61260
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 27.9 21.2660 1.5 13.6660
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.3 20.5440 0.0 6.8440
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 47.0 62.0 15.0 51.0Yes128100Above Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 51.0 51.0 0.0 51.0No3575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-15--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-17--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 46.0 63.0 17.0 51.0Yes85100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 42.0 52.0 10.0 51.0Yes12875On Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 44.0 33.0 -11.0 51.0No3525Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-15--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-17--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 40.0 56.0 16.0 51.0Yes85100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 92.0 60.02525
High needs 92.0 60.02525
EL and Former EL- 60.025-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students200199100Yes200200100Yes6767100Yes
High needs535298Yes5353100Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged18---18---9---
EL and Former EL24---24---7---
Students w/ disabilities3232100Yes3232100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian3535100Yes3535100Yes9---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino21---21---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13---8---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12812799Yes128128100Yes4444100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles