Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Casimir Pulaski
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Casimir Pulaski
Organization Information
District:New Bedford (02010000)School type:Elementary School
School:Casimir Pulaski (02010123)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.3, Target = 87.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.3, Target = 87.3 75 or Higher All Students 78.3 86.7 84.3 -2.4 87.3 89.2 4428525No Change
High needsCPI = 78.2, Target = 81.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 78.2, Target = 81.8 75 or Higher High needs 68.8 81.6 78.2 -3.4 81.8 84.4 621810Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81, Target = 86.1 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 81, Target = 86.1 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 84.8 84.8 81.0 -3.8 86.1 92.4 711290Declined
EL and Former EL -------28--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.5, Target = 75 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 67.5, Target = 75 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 57.1 73.1 67.5 -5.6 75.0 78.6 59900Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino  67.9---- 84.0-37--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.  87.5---- 93.8-27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.5, Target = 88.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 85.5, Target = 88.7 75 or Higher White 80.7 87.9 85.5 -2.4 88.7 90.4 3520225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.5, Target = 86.3 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 85.5, Target = 86.375 or Higher All Students 76.5 85.2 85.5 0.3 86.3 88.3 5028375On Target
High needsCPI = 78.9, Target = 82.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 78.9, Target = 82.5 75 or Higher High needs 70.0 80.4 78.9 -1.5 82.5 85.0 6318125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.2, Target = 84.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 81.2, Target = 84.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 83.3 83.3 81.2 -2.1 84.7 91.7 7112925No Change
EL and Former EL -------28--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.1, Target = 77.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 68.1, Target = 77.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 60.7 70.0 68.1 -1.9 77.1 80.4 609025No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino  65.2---- 82.6-37--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.  82.7---- 91.4-27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87, Target = 87.5 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 87, Target = 87.575 or Higher White 78.6 87.6 87.0 -0.6 87.5 89.3 4420075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.1, Target = 80.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 73.1, Target = 80.6 75 or Higher All Students 66.8 72.4 73.1 0.7 80.6 83.4 299350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 68, Target = 75.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 68, Target = 75.4 75 or Higher High needs 57.8 68.1 68.0 -0.1 75.4 78.9 516425No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.8, Target = 69.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 73.8, Target = 69.7CPI = 73.8, Target = 69.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 66.9 66.9 73.8 6.9 69.7 83.5 7342100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.3, Target = 65.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 58.3, Target = 65.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 48.9 58.6 58.3 -0.3 65.9 74.5 383025No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.2, Target = 83 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 76.2, Target = 83 75 or Higher White 70.8 75.8 76.2 0.4 83.0 85.4 186450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.2 9.82850 3.6 6.72850
High needs 7.2 6.61810 5.4 9.91810
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.9 9.31290 3.6 9.31290
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 2.2900 10.0 17.8900
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--37---37-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--27---27-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.8 11.92020 1.9 5.92020
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.0 36.728325 7.6 8.52830
High needs 19.9 22.718125 12.0 13.31810
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.0 27.11290 9.8 11.61290
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities 6.7 10.09025 22.2 23.3900
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--37---37-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--27---27-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.3 40.020025 5.2 6.52000
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.1 4.3930 16.5 11.89325
High needs 5.6 0.0640 25.9 15.66425
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.0 0.0420 27.5 9.54225
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 0.0300 40.6 26.73025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.5 6.3640 8.1 10.9640
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 64.5 38.0 -26.5 51.0No18325Below Target
High needsSGP = 33.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 63.5 33.5 -30.0 51.0No11225Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 37, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 64.0 37.0 -27.0 51.0No7825Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 26, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 26, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 63.0 26.0 -37.0 51.0No550Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-11--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 65.0 39.5 -25.5 51.0No13225Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 73.0 65.0 -8.0 51.0Yes179100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 69.5 59.0 -10.5 51.0No11275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60.5, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 73.0 60.5 -12.5 51.0No78100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 42, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 42, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 58.0 42.0 -16.0 51.0No5550Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-11--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 5175 or Higher White 73.0 66.0 -7.0 51.0Yes131100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 58.0 60.032.000
High needs 58.0 60.032.000
EL and Former EL 58.0 60.032.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students29529299Yes29428998Yes969599Yes
High needs19018798Yes18918698Yes676699Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged13713498Yes13613398Yes444398Yes
EL and Former EL2929100Yes2929100Yes10---
Students w/ disabilities989597Yes989597Yes333297Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black16---16---5---
Hispanic/Latino424198Yes424198Yes13---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2727100Yes2727100Yes11---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White20720599Yes20620298Yes666598Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles