Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Carlos Pacheco

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Carlos Pacheco

Organization Information

District:

New Bedford (02010000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Carlos Pacheco (02010105)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.5	67.8	67.8	0.0	89.2	90.8	6	149	25	No Change
High needs		80.9	66.7	66.6	-0.1	88.9	90.5	14	140	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.2	67.2	67.5	0.3	69.9	83.6	15	117	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		64.7	64.7	64.9	0.2	67.6	82.4	32	94	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.4	66.8	64.4	-2.4	88.6	90.2	18	73	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.5	68.5	72.9	4.4	92.1	93.3	4	47	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.4	62.8	67.1	4.3	92.7	93.7	6	148	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		87.4	62.2	66.2	4.0	92.7	93.7	15	139	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		62.9	62.9	66.6	3.7	66.0	81.5	15	116	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		64.2	64.2	68.0	3.8	67.2	82.1	31	93	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		86.1	65.4	66.1	0.7	91.9	93.1	26	73	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.3	59.8	69.6	9.8	95.5	96.2	4	46	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.8	56.9	48.4	-8.5	76.6	79.9	5	46	0	Declined
High needs		58.3	56.1	47.2	-8.9	75.7	79.2	7	45	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.8	57.8	45.8	-12.0	61.3	78.9	10	36	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		57.1	57.1	48.2	-8.9	60.7	78.6	32	28	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		53.8	-	-	-	-	76.9	-	21	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	2.7	149	25	13.8	18.8	149	0
High needs	0.0	2.9	140	25	14.4	20.0	140	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	3.4	117	25	13.8	19.7	117	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	2.1	94	25	17.9	22.3	94	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	1.4	73	25	17.1	21.9	73	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	6.4	47	25	10.9	14.9	47	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.1	8.1	148	25	24.8	20.3	148	25
High needs	2.2	7.2	139	25	25.2	21.6	139	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.6	8.6	116	25	25.9	19.8	116	25
EL and Former EL	2.1	6.5	93	25	23.2	21.5	93	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.3	6.8	73	25	20.0	20.5	73	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	15.2	46	25	28.3	23.9	46	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	2.2	46	25	25.0	45.7	46	0
High needs	0.0	2.2	45	25	27.0	46.7	45	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	2.8	36	25	25.0	50.0	36	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	3.6	28	25	25.0	42.9	28	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		40.0	30.5	-9.5	51.0	No	86	25	Below Target
High needs		40.0	30.5	-9.5	51.0	No	82	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		40.5	27.0	-13.5	51.0	No	67	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		29.0	34.0	5.0	51.0	No	56	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		34.5	35.0	0.5	51.0	No	40	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		40.0	35.0	-5.0	51.0	Yes	25	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		30.0	38.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	85	75	On Target
High needs		31.0	37.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	81	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		31.5	36.0	4.5	51.0	No	66	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		29.5	40.0	10.5	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		33.5	42.5	9.0	51.0	No	40	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		25.0	18.5	-6.5	51.0	Yes	24	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	57.0	60.0	131.00	0
High needs	57.0	60.0	131.00	0
EL and Former EL	57.0	60.0	131.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	164	163	99	Yes	163	161	99	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
High needs	154	153	99	Yes	153	151	99	Yes	46	46	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	127	126	99	Yes	127	125	98	Yes	36	36	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	99	98	99	Yes	98	96	98	Yes	29	29	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	25	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	82	81	99	Yes	82	81	99	Yes	22	22	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	50	50	100	Yes	49	48	98	Yes	15	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.