Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ellen R Hathaway

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Ellen R Hathaway

Organization Information
District:New Bedford (02010000)School type:Elementary School
School:Ellen R Hathaway (02010075)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 65, Target = 87.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 65, Target = 87.9 75 or Higher All Students 79.2 57.0 65.0 8.0 87.9 89.6 512350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 60.3, Target = 86.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 60.3, Target = 86.1 75 or Higher High needs 76.1 49.5 60.3 10.8 86.1 88.1 410250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 62.8, Target = 55.5 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 62.8, Target = 55.5CPI = 62.8, Target = 55.575 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 51.5 51.5 62.8 11.3 55.5 75.8 786100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 49.3, Target = 31.9 - EL and Former ELEL and Former EL-CPI = 49.3, Target = 31.9CPI = 49.3, Target = 31.975 or Higher EL and Former EL 18.3 35.2 49.3 14.1 31.9 59.2 367100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 55.9, Target = 83.3 - Hispanic/Latino75 or Higher Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino CPI = 55.9, Target = 83.3 75 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 71.3 46.4 55.9 9.5 83.3 85.7 47250Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.3, Target = 89.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 82.3, Target = 89.9 75 or Higher White 82.6 70.7 82.3 11.6 89.9 91.3 213150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 66.2, Target = 85.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 66.2, Target = 85.1 75 or Higher All Students 74.4 57.4 66.2 8.8 85.1 87.2 512250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.7, Target = 83.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 62.7, Target = 83.8 75 or Higher High needs 72.2 52.0 62.7 10.7 83.8 86.1 810250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.4, Target = 57.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 63.4, Target = 57.6CPI = 63.4, Target = 57.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 53.7 53.7 63.4 9.7 57.6 76.9 986100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 56.3, Target = 35.5 - EL and Former ELEL and Former EL-CPI = 56.3, Target = 35.5CPI = 56.3, Target = 35.575 or Higher EL and Former EL 22.6 44.3 56.3 12.0 35.5 61.3 767100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 60.6, Target = 80.8 - Hispanic/Latino75 or Higher Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino CPI = 60.6, Target = 80.8 75 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 67.0 51.2 60.6 9.4 80.8 83.5 117150Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.2, Target = 87.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 78.2, Target = 87.6 75 or Higher White 78.8 65.7 78.2 12.5 87.6 89.4 113150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 43.3, Target = 83.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 43.3, Target = 83.5 75 or Higher All Students 71.7 42.2 43.3 1.1 83.5 85.9 24150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 42.1, Target = 77.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 42.1, Target = 77.1 75 or Higher High needs 60.7 36.2 42.1 5.9 77.1 80.4 33550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 42.7, Target = 46 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 42.7, Target = 46 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 41.1 41.1 42.7 1.6 46.0 70.6 63150Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL  25.0---- 62.5-28--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino  33.8---- 66.9-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------7--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 0.0 3.312325 33.1 24.412325
High needs 0.0 2.910225 40.8 29.410225
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 3.58625 40.2 29.18625
EL and Former EL 0.0 1.56725 59.0 40.36725
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 1.47225 46.8 34.77225
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 9.73125 14.3 6.53125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 3.3 11.512225 34.7 26.212225
High needs 1.0 6.910225 40.8 29.410225
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.2 8.18625 40.2 31.48625
EL and Former EL 0.0 3.06725 47.5 34.36725
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino 1.6 4.27125 45.2 31.07125
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.7 22.63125 22.9 12.93125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 2.2 0.0410 51.1 51.2410
High needs 0.0 0.0350 60.5 51.43525
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0310 50.0 54.8310
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--29---29-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--7---7-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 63.0 45.0 -18.0 51.0No6850Below Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 58.0 45.0 -13.0 51.0Yes5475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 44, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 56.5 44.0 -12.5 51.0Yes4875On Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 41, Target = 51 - EL and Former EL75 or Higher EL and Former ELEL and Former EL SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher EL and Former EL 61.0 41.0 -20.0 51.0No3450Below Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 46.5, Target = 51 - Hispanic/Latino75 or Higher Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 61.0 46.5 -14.5 51.0No3850Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-18--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 59.0 54.0 -5.0 51.0Yes6775On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 59.0 47.0 -12.0 51.0Yes5475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 50, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 50, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 51.5 50.0 -1.5 51.0Yes4875On Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 46, Target = 51 - EL and Former EL75 or Higher EL and Former ELEL and Former EL SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher EL and Former EL 72.0 46.0 -26.0 51.0Yes3475On Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 60, Target = 51 - Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 62.0 60.0 -2.0 51.0Yes37100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-18--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 73.0 60.0101.0025
High needs 73.0 60.0101.0025
EL and Former EL 73.0 60.0101.0025
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13613599Yes13613499Yes4242100Yes
High needs11511499Yes11511499Yes3636100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged979699Yes979699Yes3232100Yes
EL and Former EL7676100Yes7676100Yes2929100Yes
Students w/ disabilities23---23---8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black12---12---3---
Hispanic/Latino828199Yes828098Yes3030100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White3232100Yes3232100Yes7---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles