Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John B Devalles

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - John B Devalles

Organization Information

District:

New Bedford (02010000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

John B Devalles (02010050)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.2	73.8	76.8	3.0	81.5	84.1	21	149	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		66.0	73.1	76.5	3.4	80.2	83.0	54	136	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.3	73.3	76.3	3.0	75.5	86.7	48	112	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		66.4	75.0	72.9	-2.1	80.4	83.2	58	48	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		53.2	56.4	60.0	3.6	72.7	76.6	36	40	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		65.7	74.6	74.0	-0.6	80.0	82.9	57	51	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		72.5	71.0	77.9	6.9	84.0	86.3	10	70	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.9	68.5	79.9	11.4	80.7	83.5	26	148	75	On Target
High needs		66.0	67.5	79.3	11.8	80.2	83.0	65	135	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.3	67.3	78.2	10.9	70.0	83.7	57	111	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		61.2	71.2	75.5	4.3	77.4	80.6	54	48	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		57.8	53.5	70.0	16.5	75.4	78.9	65	40	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.5	68.2	81.9	13.7	78.1	81.3	79	51	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		68.8	68.1	76.4	8.3	81.8	84.4	9	69	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.4	53.8	51.3	-2.5	77.5	80.7	7	40	25	No Change
High needs		59.8	52.2	51.4	-0.8	76.6	79.9	12	37	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.3	51.3	50.9	-0.4	55.4	75.7	19	27	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.0	1.3	149	0	12.6	10.7	149	25
High needs	1.5	1.5	136	0	13.0	11.8	136	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.9	0.9	112	0	14.8	10.7	112	25
EL and Former EL	5.1	4.2	48	0	5.1	16.7	48	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	40	0	30.2	30.0	40	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.7	2.0	51	25	10.2	11.8	51	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.6	1.4	70	0	17.5	10.0	70	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.7	12.8	148	25	18.7	12.2	148	25
High needs	6.9	12.6	135	25	19.2	13.3	135	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.1	11.7	111	25	19.3	14.4	111	25
EL and Former EL	15.4	12.5	48	0	15.4	18.8	48	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.5	40	25	39.5	25.0	40	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.5	9.8	51	25	15.3	9.8	51	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	4.8	15.9	69	25	22.6	17.4	69	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.9	0.0	40	0	30.2	22.5	40	25
High needs	2.2	0.0	37	0	33.3	21.6	37	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	27	0	37.5	18.5	27	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.0	41.5	-11.5	51.0	No	80	50	Below Target
High needs		50.0	43.5	-6.5	51.0	Yes	72	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.0	40.5	-4.5	51.0	No	62	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.5	44.0	3.5	51.0	Yes	21	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.0	42.0	-6.0	51.0	No	31	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		53.0	40.5	-12.5	51.0	Yes	36	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		39.0	45.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	81	75	On Target
High needs		39.0	45.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	73	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	45.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	63	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	29.5	-20.5	51.0	Yes	22	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		45.0	45.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	31	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		23.0	39.0	16.0	51.0	Yes	37	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	55.0	60.0	56.00	0
High needs	55.0	60.0	56.00	0
EL and Former EL	55.0	60.0	56.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	157	157	100	Yes	157	156	99	Yes	44	43	98	Yes
High needs	143	143	100	Yes	143	142	99	Yes	41	40	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	119	119	100	Yes	119	118	99	Yes	31	30	97	Yes
EL and Former EL	52	52	100	Yes	52	52	100	Yes	13	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	42	42	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	17	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	54	54	100	Yes	54	54	100	Yes	17	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	74	74	100	Yes	74	73	99	Yes	19	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.