Massachusetts School and District Profiles

James B Congdon
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - James B Congdon
Organization Information
District:New Bedford (02010000)School type:Elementary School
School:James B Congdon (02010040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 69.3, Target = 87.7CPI = 69.3, Target = 87.7CPI = 69.3, Target = 87.7 78.9 78.9 69.3 -9.6 87.7 89.5 81570Declined
High needsCPI = 66.5, Target = 87.5CPI = 66.5, Target = 87.5CPI = 66.5, Target = 87.5 78.6 75.8 66.5 -9.3 87.5 89.3 141200Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.7, Target = 78.5CPI = 68.7, Target = 78.5CPI = 68.7, Target = 78.5 76.5 76.5 68.7 -7.8 78.5 88.3 191070Declined
EL and Former EL -------38--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 65.4, Target = 88.2CPI = 65.4, Target = 88.2CPI = 65.4, Target = 88.2 79.8 72.7 65.4 -7.3 88.2 89.9 22570Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 75.3, Target = 86.8CPI = 75.3, Target = 86.8CPI = 75.3, Target = 86.8 77.4 81.1 75.3 -5.8 86.8 88.7 6750Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.8, Target = 86.6CPI = 72.8, Target = 86.6CPI = 72.8, Target = 86.6 77.0 75.0 72.8 -2.2 86.6 88.5 1215725No Change
High needsCPI = 71.7, Target = 86.1CPI = 71.7, Target = 86.1CPI = 71.7, Target = 86.1 76.2 71.4 71.7 0.3 86.1 88.1 3112050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.7, Target = 74.7CPI = 71.7, Target = 74.7CPI = 71.7, Target = 74.7 72.4 72.4 71.7 -0.7 74.7 86.2 3110725No Change
EL and Former EL -------38--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 78.9, Target = 93.1CPI = 78.9, Target = 93.1CPI = 78.9, Target = 93.1 88.1 76.5 78.9 2.4 93.1 94.1 715750Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 68, Target = 84.7CPI = 68, Target = 84.7CPI = 68, Target = 84.7 73.8 74.6 68.0 -6.6 84.7 86.9 3750Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 70.8, Target = 84.5CPI = 70.8, Target = 84.5CPI = 70.8, Target = 84.5 73.4 90.6 70.8 -19.8 84.5 86.7 25360Declined
High needsCPI = 68, Target = 84.9CPI = 68, Target = 84.9CPI = 68, Target = 84.9 74.1 88.0 68.0 -20.0 84.9 87.1 51250Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  71.6---- 85.8-21--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.6 3.215725 6.1 17.21570
High needs 2.2 0.81200 7.7 18.31200
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.4 0.91070 8.2 15.91070
EL and Former EL--38---38-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 1.85725 12.1 19.3570
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.3 5.3750 3.5 12.0750
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.4 14.615725 10.4 16.61570
High needs 7.7 10.812025 12.1 16.71200
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.2 10.310725 10.6 15.91070
EL and Former EL--38---38-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino 3.0 17.55725 6.1 12.3570
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.5 13.3750 14.0 20.0750
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.5 11.1360 0.0 5.6360
High needs 4.0 4.0250 0.0 4.0250
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--21---21-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51 43.0 25.0 -18.0 51.0No770Below Target
High needsSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 38.0 26.0 -12.0 51.0No580Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 33.0 26.0 -7.0 51.0No550Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-15--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51 46.0 25.0 -21.0 51.0No390Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 33.0 31.0 -2.0 51.0No7725Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 29.0 34.0 5.0 51.0No5850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 28.0 34.0 6.0 51.0No5550Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-15--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 34.0 29.0 -5.0 51.0No390Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 67.0 60.07625
High needs 67.0 60.07625
EL and Former EL 67.0 60.076-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students185185100Yes185185100Yes4444100Yes
High needs147147100Yes147147100Yes3333100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged123123100Yes123123100Yes27---
EL and Former EL5959100Yes5959100Yes12---
Students w/ disabilities28---28---5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black20---20---3---
Hispanic/Latino7676100Yes7676100Yes15---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White7979100Yes7979100Yes2222100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles