Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sunita L. Williams Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hillside Elementary
Organization Information
District:Needham (01990000)School type:Elementary School
School:Hillside Elementary (01990035)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.3, Target = 93.8CPI = 93.3, Target = 93.8 89.4 91.1 93.3 2.2 93.8 94.7 8722975On Target
High needsCPI = 80.2, Target = 83.8CPI = 80.2, Target = 83.8CPI = 80.2, Target = 83.8 72.3 80.8 80.2 -0.6 83.8 86.2 716225No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.6, Target = 79.2CPI = 76.6, Target = 79.2CPI = 76.6, Target = 79.2 64.3 76.2 76.6 0.4 79.2 82.2 824650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.8, Target = 95.3CPI = 92.8, Target = 95.3CPI = 92.8, Target = 95.3 91.9 91.1 92.8 1.7 95.3 96.0 7818575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 92.8CPI = 92.4, Target = 92.8 87.6 92.2 92.4 0.2 92.8 93.8 8222975On Target
High needsCPI = 80.2, Target = 84.5CPI = 80.2, Target = 84.5CPI = 80.2, Target = 84.5 73.4 79.9 80.2 0.3 84.5 86.7 696250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.9, Target = 79.5CPI = 73.9, Target = 79.5CPI = 73.9, Target = 79.5 64.9 73.8 73.9 0.1 79.5 82.5 754650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.9, Target = 94.1CPI = 91.9, Target = 94.1CPI = 91.9, Target = 94.1 89.9 92.2 91.9 -0.3 94.1 95.0 7418525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 88.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 88.8, Target = 93.5 88.8 87.9 88.8 0.9 93.5 94.4 797650Improved Below Target
High needs  83.8---- 91.9-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 88.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 88.3, Target = 94.6 90.8 90.1 88.3 -1.8 94.6 95.4 666425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.8 19.72290 2.4 1.322925
High needs 3.6 6.56225 7.1 4.86225
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.24625 9.8 6.54625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--17---17-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.1 18.91850 2.5 1.618525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.4 48.522925 3.4 3.52290
High needs 16.1 27.46225 10.7 11.3620
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 14.6 15.2460 14.6 15.2460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--17---17-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 40.4 49.718525 4.3 4.31850
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.3 32.97625 5.0 5.3760
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.9 32.86425 4.2 6.3640
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 54.0 62.0 8.0 51.0Yes140100Above Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 40.0 46.0 6.0 51.0No3450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 51.0 61.0 10.0 51.0Yes109100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51 63.0 62.5 -0.5 51.0No142100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 62.5 62.0 -0.5 51.0No35100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 61.5 62.0 0.5 51.0No110100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students235234100Yes235234100Yes777699Yes
High needs6565100Yes6565100Yes2020100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged15---15---4---
EL and Former EL13---13---3---
Students w/ disabilities4747100Yes4747100Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian19---19---7---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---1---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White187187100Yes187187100Yes6464100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles