Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cyrus Peirce

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Cyrus Peirce

Organization Information

District:

Nantucket (01970000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Cyrus Peirce (01970010)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.8	85.1	87.7	2.6	94.1	94.9	37	319	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		78.1	66.8	74.3	7.5	87.2	89.1	22	111	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.2	73.2	79.3	6.1	75.4	86.6	29	64	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		69.3	-	69.5	5.9	77.0	84.7	42	32	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		71.9	62.8	67.0	4.2	83.6	86.0	43	47	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		78.7	76.4	83.8	7.4	87.6	89.4	62	34	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		82.3	66.7	72.8	6.1	89.7	91.2	22	58	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		92.8	91.6	92.3	0.7	95.8	96.4	50	200	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.7	74.5	71.0	-3.5	82.3	84.9	24	318	0	Declined
High needs		52.8	55.4	53.6	-1.8	72.5	76.4	9	110	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.7	60.7	54.8	-5.9	64.0	80.4	8	63	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		39.8	-	45.3	4.3	54.9	69.9	20	32	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		48.0	46.7	50.0	3.3	69.7	74.0	49	47	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		45.0	60.1	58.3	-1.8	67.9	72.5	41	33	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		53.1	54.2	47.0	-7.2	72.6	76.6	6	58	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		76.4	83.1	79.9	-3.2	86.2	88.2	42	200	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.9	70.4	72.4	2.0	83.6	86.0	39	127	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		57.7	55.3	59.0	3.7	75.3	78.9	40	47	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.7	-	-	-	-	83.4	-	26	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		60.0	-	-	-	-	80.0	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		77.2	77.8	80.2	2.4	86.7	88.6	63	82	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.4	11.3	319	0	9.8	7.8	319	25
High needs	6.5	5.4	111	0	25.2	17.1	111	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.3	9.4	64	0	19.1	14.1	64	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	3.1	32	25	21.2	31.3	32	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	47	0	31.1	17.0	47	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2.7	0.0	34	0	16.2	8.8	34	25
Hispanic/Latino	1.9	1.7	58	0	27.8	24.1	58	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	14.4	15.5	200	0	4.3	4.0	200	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.2	12.3	318	0	20.0	23.3	318	0
High needs	2.8	4.5	110	25	45.8	47.3	110	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.4	7.9	63	25	41.2	44.4	63	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	32	0	58.3	56.3	32	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	47	0	57.8	55.3	47	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	0.0	33	0	35.1	33.3	33	0
Hispanic/Latino	5.6	0.0	58	0	46.3	53.4	58	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	20.7	17.0	200	0	10.1	13.5	200	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.0	1.6	127	25	17.3	10.2	127	25
High needs	3.0	0.0	47	0	33.3	25.5	47	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	2.4	82	25	8.5	3.7	82	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.5	58.0	7.5	51.0	Yes	291	75	On Target
High needs		46.0	61.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	92	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.5	72.0	20.5	51.0	Yes	53	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		38.0	49.0	11.0	51.0	No	39	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		43.0	71.5	28.5	51.0	Yes	30	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		45.0	63.5	18.5	51.0	Yes	52	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		53.0	56.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	187	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	41.0	-8.0	51.0	No	289	50	Below Target
High needs		46.0	51.0	5.0	51.0	No	91	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.5	45.0	1.5	51.0	No	52	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.0	42.0	-22.0	51.0	No	39	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		45.0	40.0	-5.0	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		60.0	44.0	-16.0	51.0	No	52	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		49.0	41.0	-8.0	51.0	No	186	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	56.0	60.0	23.00	0
High needs	56.0	60.0	23.00	0
EL and Former EL	56.0	60.0	23.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	335	335	100	Yes	334	334	100	Yes	129	129	100	Yes
High needs	124	124	100	Yes	123	123	100	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	71	71	100	Yes	70	70	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	42	42	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	47	47	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes	23	23	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	37	37	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	68	68	100	Yes	68	68	100	Yes	25	25	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	203	203	100	Yes	203	203	100	Yes	84	84	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.